Table of Contents

Issue 1

Issue 1

November 2022

Issue 1

Letter From IYNA October Chapter

Dear readers,
Last season, we accepted many members to our research committee. We welcomed them thoroughly into our team and started preparing them for their future responsibilities of writing research papers for our Journal. However, the last season couldn't achieve the mission, which is publishing those papers. The season of 2021-2022 with the new board began achieving those goals. Working on their English skills, especially writing, was the first step on the road. After all, a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. After improving their English skills, we sought to learn the ways of research from an expert, which is why the members joined the course "Writing in the Sciences.". Each member was writing about different topics related to neuroscience, and while doing that, their work was being revised to catch the mistakes and perfect the writing skills of our members. The organization’s mission is to create an environment for scientists by allowing them to publish their articles in our Journal. Thus, we proudly announce that we are the first neuroscience journal in Egypt that fosters youth scientists to translate their thoughts into words by publishing their articles. We are thrilled to announce the publication of the season's first issue. The articles display the eagerness of the youth neuroscientists to conduct their own articles, adding their ideas and perspectives. We thank the committee head and his vices for their spectacular work as seniors who sacrificed their time to supervise this long project and the amazing contributors who had only the benefit of the team in their minds. Finally, we must credit the youth Science Journal's research committee for their efforts and the live sessions about conducting a research article. Best Regards,
IYNA October Chapter

The Cerebrum: The Ultimate crown of creation and evolution

Abstract The cerebrum, also known as the telencephalon or endbrain, is the largest part of the brain, containing the cerebral cortex (two hemispheres of the brain) as well as several subcortical structures such as the hippocampus, basal ganglia, and olfactory bulb. it is the uppermost region of the central nervous system in the human brain. The cerebrum develops from the forebrain during pregnancy (prosencephalon). The cerebrum is also divided into left and right cerebral hemispheres that are roughly symmetric. The cerebrum, with the help of the cerebellum, is in charge of all voluntary actions in the human body.

I. Introduction

Figure 1
Figure 1: Location of the human cerebrum (red)
The cerebrum, which is in front or top of the brainstem (as shown in Fig.1), makes up a large portion of the brain. It is the largest and most developed part of the brain's five major divisions in humans. In a phylogenetic sense, the cerebrum is the most recent structure, with mammals having the largest and most developed among all species. It contains the cerebral cortex that develops from the dorsal telencephalon or pallium, and the basal ganglia that develop from the ventral telencephalon, or sub-pallium, in mammals. The cerebral cortex in larger mammals is folded into many gyri and sulci, allowing it to expand in a surface area without taking up much more volume. The cerebrum controls all voluntary actions in the body with the help of the cerebellum.

II. Overview of the cerebrum

i. Cerebral cortex

Figure 2
Figure 2: The cerebral cortex is shown in dark violet as the outermost layer. Notice the cortex's folded structure: the "valleys" of the cortex are referred to as sulci.
A large sulcus divides the cortex into two hemispheres, right and left. The corpus callosum, a thick fiber bundle that connects the two hemispheres, allows information to flow from one side to the other. The right hemisphere is in charge of controlling and processing signals from the left side of the body, while the left hemisphere is in charge of controlling and processing signals from the right. Figure 2 shows the internal structure of the cerebral cortex.

ii. The four brain lobes

Figure 3
Figure 3: Location of the cerebral lobes

Each hemisphere of the mammalian cerebral cortex has four functionally and spatially distinct lobes: frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital (as shown in Fig.3).

The frontal lobe, located at the front of the brain, over the eyes, contains the olfactory bulb. The frontal lobe also houses the motor cortex, which is responsible for movement planning and execution.

Processing somatosensorial (touch sensations such as pressure, pain, heat, and cold) and proprioception are two of the main functions of the parietal lobe (the sense of how parts of the body are oriented in space).

The temporal lobe is near the base of the brain, near the ears. Its primary function is to process and interpret sounds. It also houses the hippocampus, which is in charge of memory formation. The occipital lobe is in the back of the brain. It is mostly concerned with the vision: seeing, recognizing, and identifying the visual world.

iii. Cerebrum function

The cerebrum directs the body's conscious or volitional motor functions. These functions originate in the primary motor cortex and other motor areas of the frontal lobe where actions are planned. Upper motor neurons in the primary motor cortex extend axons to the brainstem and spinal cord, where they make synapses on lower motor neurons that innervate the muscles. Certain types of motor neuron disease can result from damage to motor areas in the cortex. Rather than total paralysis, this type of injury results in a loss of muscular power and precision. The olfactory sensory system is distinctive in that neurons in the olfactory bulb elongate their axons directly to the olfactory cortex rather than to the thalamus. The sense of smell is lost when the olfactory bulb is damaged. Top-down information is also received by the olfactory bulb from brain areas such as the amygdala, neocortex, hippocampus, locus coeruleus, and substantia nigra. Its potential functions can be classified into four non-exclusive categories: discriminating between odors, detection of odors with high sensitivity, filtration of background odors out, and permission of higher brain areas, which are involved in arousal and attention, to modify odor detection or discrimination. Parts of the cerebral cortex are primarily responsible for speech and language. Broca's area in the frontal lobe is responsible for motor aspects of language. Wernicke's area, located at the temporal-parietal lobe junction, is considered to be responsible for speech comprehension. Damage to the Broca's area causes expressive aphasia (non-fluent aphasia), whereas damage to the Wernicke area causes receptive aphasia.

III. Cerebral lobes

Brain lobes (as shown in Fig.3) were once thought to be purely anatomical classifications, but we now know that they are also linked to specific brain functions. The largest portion of the human brain, the telencephalon (cerebrum), is divided into lobes like the cerebellum. If not otherwise specified, the term "brain lobes" refers to the telencephalon. The telencephalon has four uncontested lobes.

i. The frontal lobe

The frontal lobe is a region of the mammalian brain that is located in the front of each cerebral hemisphere, anterior to (in front of) the parietal lobe, and superior and anterior to the temporal lobes. It is separated from the parietal lobe by the central sulcus, which is a space between tissues, and from the temporal lobe by the lateral (Sylvian) sulcus, which is a deep fold. The primary motor cortex, which controls voluntary movements of specific body parts, is located in the precentral gyrus, which forms the posterior border of the frontal lobe. The frontal lobe houses the majority of the cerebral cortex's dopamine-sensitive neurons. Dopamine is linked to reward, attention, short-term memory tasks, planning, and motivation. Dopamine tends to limit and select the sensory information sent to the forebrain by the thalamus. According to a National Institute of Mental Health report, a gene variant that reduces dopamine activity in the prefrontal cortex is associated with poorer performance in that region during memory tasks; this gene variant is also associated with a slightly increased risk of schizophrenia. The frontal lobe contributes to our most human characteristics. Damage to the frontal lobe can cause personality changes and difficulty planning. The frontal lobes are the most distinguishing feature of the human brain.

ii. The parietal lobe

The parietal lobe is located above (superior to) the occipital lobe and behind (posterior to) the frontal lobe. The parietal lobe integrates sensory data from various modalities particularly spatial sense and navigation. It includes, for example, the somatosensory cortex and the dorsal stream of the visual system. This allows parietal cortex regions to map visually perceived objects into body coordinate positions. Several areas of the parietal lobe play a role in language processing as well. This lobe also integrates information from various senses and aids in object manipulation. Visuospatial processing is carried out in parts of the parietal lobe.

iii. The occipital lobe

The two occipital lobes in the human cerebral cortex are the smallest of the four paired lobes. The occipital lobes are part of the forebrain and are located in the back of the skull. There are several lateral occipital gyri at the front edge of the occipital separated by lateral occipital sulci. The occipital lobe is involved in vision; lesions in this area can cause hallucinations.

iv. The temporal lobe

The temporal lobe is a cerebral cortex region located beneath the lateral fissure on both cerebral hemispheres of the mammalian brain. The temporal lobes are involved in many functions including visual memory retention, sensory input processing, language comprehension, storing new memories, feeling, expressing emotion, and meaning derivation. The hippocampus is located in the temporal lobe and is important in the formation of explicit long-term memory, which is modulated by the amygdala. It is involved in the processing of complex stimuli as well as the senses of smell and sound.

IV. The white matter of the cerebrum

Figure 5
Figure 5: A human brain lateral cross-section: In this dissected human brain, white matter appears white, while grey matter appears darker. White matter is mostly made up of myelinated axons.
White matter is one of the two components of the central nervous system (CNS). It is made up primarily of glial cells and myelinated axons, and it makes up the majority of the deep parts of the cerebrum and the superficial parts of the spinal cord (as shown in Fig.5). Because myelin is primarily composed of lipid tissue with capillaries, white matter tissue in a freshly cut brain appears pinkish white to the naked eye.

White matter axons carry nerve impulses between neurons and transmit signals from various grey matter areas (the locations of nerve cell bodies) of the cerebrum to one another. While grey matter is associated with processing and cognition, white matter modulates action potential distribution, acting as a relay and coordinating communication between different brain regions.

V. Conclusion

The cerebrum is the brain's largest structure. It oversees memory, speech, senses, and emotional reactions. It is divided into four lobes: the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital. Each is in charge of a specific aspect of the cerebrum's functions. The cerebrum is composed of white matter, which is the tissue that allows messages to travel between different areas of grey matter in the central nervous system.

VI. References

Addiction and recovery

Abstract The words “addiction” and “habit” seem to be similar, but they are completely different; addiction is considered an illness that affects the individual’s whole life and his surroundings. Whether the person got addicted to good or bad behaviors, it is still the same condition. Addiction has different types. It is treatable and has special treatment centers and hospitals. Drug abuse and addiction to alcohol have become real threats to society. Addiction has no age; many teens and adults have been involved in the addiction of alcohol and drug abuse [1].

I. Introduction

Figure 1
Addiction is a chronic disease involving complex interactions among brain circuits, genetics, the environment, and an individual's life experiences. People with addiction use substances such as drugs and engage in compulsive behaviors despite the bad consequences. It starts when a person feels something enjoyable; the reward system in the brain releases dopamine and other chemicals. This action reinforces the brain’s association between certain things and feelings of pleasure, making the person want those things again. The desire to experience these things again grows over time until it becomes a craving. This is the first sign of addiction. Through the continuous use of a substance or engaging in a behavior, the brain produces a large amount of dopamine. The brain’s reward system gets used to this amount and needs it. Then, the person loses interest in things he once enjoyed, because the brain no longer produces much dopamine in response to natural triggers. The addiction develops and the person becomes unable to control his need for substance or behavior, and cannot give up on it [2]. Studies have shown that drug abuse has harmful effects on the metabolic processes in the brain. Health care offers treatment of different types of addiction for those people to increase productivity, as shown in fig1 [3].

II. Mechanism of addiction

Figure 2
A binge/intoxication-related circuit, a withdrawal/negative affect-related circuit, and a preoccupation/anticipation (ie, craving)-related circuit have all been identified as having heuristic value for the study of neurobiological changes associated with the development and persistence of drug dependence (look at fig 2). Such pathways could be important in the treatment of drug addiction with CRF receptor antagonists, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a 41-amino acid polypeptide that mediates hormonal, autonomic, and behavioral responses to stressors. The acute reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse in the binge/intoxication stage are most likely due to actions involving the ventral striatum and extended amygdala reward system, as well as dopaminergic and opioid inputs from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, respectively [4].
The symptoms of acute withdrawal that are critical for addiction, such as dysphoria and heightened anxiety associated with the withdrawal/negative affect stage, are most likely caused by deficits in the ventral striatum's reward function, but also the activation of brain stress neurocircuitry in the extended amygdala, including CRF and norepinephrine. The preoccupation/anticipation stage also involves key afferent glutamatergic projections to the extended amygdala and nucleus accumbent, specifically from the prefrontal cortex (for drug-induced reinstatement) and the basolateral amygdala (for cue-induced reinstatement), as well as core elements of the brain stress systems in the extended amygdala (for stress-induced reinstatement). Compulsive drug-seeking is also thought to activate ventral striatal-ventral pallidal-thalamic-cortical loops, which may then engage dorsal striatal-pallidal-thalamic-cortical loops, with both effects influenced by concurrent decreases in reward function and activation of brain stress systems in the extended amygdala. The conceptual framework for this review paper is CRF's stimulation of the brain stress system, which fosters addiction dependency and compulsivity [4].

III. Types of addiction

Addiction can be classified into two types chemical and behavioral addiction. Chemical addiction involves the use of a substance while behavioral addiction involves compulsive behaviors, which are repeated without any real benefits [2].

i. Chemical addiction

The recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders recommends using the term “substance use disorder” instead of “chemical addiction” that includes more diagnostic criteria to help healthcare professionals differentiate between mild, moderate, and severe cases. The common addiction substances are alcohol, heroin, nicotine, cocaine, and cannabis. Multiple variables contribute to substance addiction and dependency, including genetic predisposition, environmental stresses, social pressures, individual personality traits, and psychiatric issues. However, in all circumstances, it is impossible to tell which of these elements has the most impact on a single person. Substance use disorder is associated with some symptoms, which are the inability to think clearly, the cravings to need more of the substance; the usage of it during work, troubles managing the responsibilities, and the inability to stop the substance [2, 5].

ii. Behavioral addiction

Figure 3
Although some researchers do not consider behavioral addiction as a real addiction, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders now recognizes two behavioral addictions, which are gambling addiction and internet gaming disorder. However, the general signs of behavioral addiction include spending a lot of time engaging in the behavior, hiding it from other people, feeling anxiety or depression when attempting to quit, and difficulty in avoiding it. Behavioral addiction can be considered under the term “impulse control disorder”. Compulsive shopping, pathologic skin picking, sexual addiction, excessive tanning, video game playing, and internet addiction are among the impulse control disorders, as in fig 3. It's still up for dispute which habits should be classified as behavioral addictions. Behavioral addictions should not include all impulse control disorders or diseases marked by impulsivity. Many impulse control disorders (e.g., pathological gambling) appear to have core characteristics in common with substance addictions [2, 6].
Few behavioral addiction family history/genetics studies with proper control groups have been designed. In small family studies of probands with pathological gambling, kleptomania, or compulsive buying disorders, first-degree relatives had significantly higher lifetime rates of alcohol and other substance use disorders, as well as depression and other psychiatric disorders, than control subjects. These controlled family investigations back up the theory that behavioral addictions and drug use disorders are linked genetically [6].

IV. Addiction treatment

Addiction is a complex but treatable disease that affects brain function and behavior. It is so hard to be treated, so they take a long time to get treatments. People with addiction should be aware that it is a problem and needs to be treated; this is the first step to recovery. Several treatments are available depending on some factors and the patient’s needs. Recovery methods include detoxification, counseling therapies, rehabilitation, self-help groups, and medications [7].
Figure 4
The first step in treatment is detoxification. It involves clearing a substance from the body and limiting the reactions. If a person is addicted to more than one substance, they will often need medications to reduce withdrawal symptoms for each. Then, the common treatment is counseling therapies. Counseling helps people change behaviors and attitudes around using a substance, as well as strengthening life skills and supporting other treatments. There are different types of therapies include cognitive-behavioral therapy, multidimensional family therapy, and motivational interviewing. Rehabilitation programs are longer-term treatment programs for substance-related and addictive disorders that can be highly effective and typically focus on remaining drug-free and resuming function within social responsibilities. Self-help groups, shown in fig 4, are where people of the same addiction meet and have conservation that leads to increase the motivation to stop the substance. People most commonly use medications during detoxification to manage withdrawal symptoms. They vary depending on the substance that the person is addicted to. Longer-term use of medications helps to reduce cravings and prevents a return to using the substance after having recovered from addiction. Medication is not a standalone treatment for addiction and should accompany other management methods such as psychotherapy [7].

V. Rat park experiment

Figure 5
In the late 1970s, professor Bruce K. Alexander has performed an experiment called “Rat Park” to determine whether outside factors could influence the potential for addiction. He took two groups of mice and separate them. Half of them were isolated in individual cages. The other half was housed in a giant, open-designed enclosure with walls painted to look like timber and cedar sawdust and dozens of crates for the mice to live and play in, essentially providing everything needed to keep the rats happy. Most importantly, the mice living in this enclosure were able to play and socialize with each other. This enclosure was known as “Rat Park” (fig 5) [8].
The scientists offered morphine mixed with sugary water, so the rats’ taste buds could not resist. The caged rats tended to drink the morphine-water fast and consumed 19 times higher than the Rat Park rats. Rat Park rats preferred their social life to engagement in the drugs. In the second stage of the experiment, after the rats gradually got addicted to morphine, they were given morphine for 9 days, then given a free day. Of the two groups, the isolated rats increased their intake from morphine-water, while the Rat Park rats drank less and tried to resist consuming the drugs; they tried to return their social life undisrupted by drugs. Professor Alexander concluded that certain environmental factors could trigger a higher likelihood of addiction [8]. This experiment has shown the importance of good mental health for overcoming addiction. Through mental health treatment and services, a person struggling with addiction can find the encouragement and support necessary for their substance abuse treatment.

VI. Conclusion

Addiction is a complex illness that affects the brain and behaviors; fortunately, it is treatable. Different types require specific treatments. Mental health and social communications are essential factors to treat addiction. People of addiction need strong support from family and friends. It became more dangerous when the person does not know he got addicted. It is a big problem that faces society and needs early action.

VII. References

Parkinson’s Disease & Other Movement Disorders

Abstract Parkinson’s has a long history. It is a very common neurodegenerative disease. It has been a great challenge to face and cope with and it may continue to be for the next couple of years. In this paper, we discuss the properties of the disease and how it is connected to other movement disorders. Although Parkinson’s disease is hard to identify because it has many similar symptoms to other neurodegenerative diseases, some symptoms were found which are specific for Parkinson’s disease.

I. Introduction

Parkinson’s is a neurodegenerative disease that affects the motor control of our bodies and may has other noncognitive effects. It was first diagnosed in 1817 by James Parkinson. The disease has many subtypes and shares symptoms with other diseases. It can cause cognitive and noncognitive symptoms. It also can result in the development of dementia. Unfortunately, the direct cause behind its pathogenesis is still unknown but there are some present theories that try to connect the dots. The treatments of the disease are all symptomatic, and there aren’t any disease modifying drugs. However, there are promising medications on the way. To understand how the treatments affect the disease, we have to look into its root causes.

II. Causes

There is no doubt that a correlation between loss of dopamine neurons and Parkinson’s disease exists. To understand this correlation, let’s look at the cause of neuronal loss of dopamine neurons. Dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra are lost as we age. About one third of them are lost between the age of 20 and 90 years. The cause behind this is considered to be due to the oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species irregular manifestation). The enzymatic oxidation of dopamine generates hycytotoxic hydroxyl radicals in the presence of iron (Ⅱ) which is rich in the substantia nigra. On the other hand, non-enzymatic oxidation of dopamine yields superoxide, which produces a quinone that binds to a thiol group and denatures active protein. This evidence connects oxidative stress to the deterioration of dopamine [1].

Figure 1
Figure 1 shows how (NM(R)Sal) is synthesized.
The depletion in dopamine neurons and the clinical features that show up as we age is very similar to what happens in Parkinson’s disease patients. Thus, aging has been considered to play a role in the development of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s was thought to be an accelerated form of aging. However, other processes are considered to be involved in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease as the loss of dopamine neurons is different in aging and Parkinson’s disease. Other evidence supports the notion that neurotoxins are involved in the deterioration of nigra-striatal dopamine system. A neurotoxin called (NM(R)Sal) was found to induce parkinsonism in rats. NM(R)Sal (R refers to R enantiomer) was found in the human brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and intraventricular fluid. (NM(R)Sal) is synthesized by a two-step enzyme reaction from dopamine as shown in Figure 1. (R)Sal is synthesized from dopamine and acetaldehyde by a (R)Salsolinol synthase and turns into (NM(R)Sal) with the addition of an N-methyltransferase [1].

NM(R)Sal is considered to occur in the nigra-striatum due to high activity of N-methyltransferase in this brain region. After its synthesis, NM(R)Sal is oxidized into (DMDHIQ+) by enzymatic or non-enzymatic oxidation that generates hydroxyl radicals. Also, the in vitro and in vivo experiments suggest that the accumulation of (DMDHIQ+) in the substantia nigra is due to the binding of (DMDHIQ+) to neuromelanin (found in large quantities in the substantia nigra). Data suggest that NM(R)Sal synthesized in the striatum is transported by retrograde axonal flow to the substantia nigra and oxidized there or on the way to produce the DMDHIQ+ [1]. It has been proven that the oxidation of (NM(R)Sal) generates hydroxyl radicals and induces the apoptotic death process [5]. In a study with 16 Parkinson’s patients, 12 of the 16 patients’ (NM(R)Sal) level was more than 6 nano molars in the cerebrospinal fluid compared with the control who had a (NM(R)Sal) level lower than 6 nano molars.

III. Motor symptoms

Parkinson’s disease since its discovery was associated with motor symptoms. Afterall, that is how Dr. James Parkinson identified it as shaking then palsy. Parkinson’s disease includes the three most agreed upon symptoms: tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia (slowness of movement). The onset of Parkinson’s disease may start as early as 12 to 14 years before diagnosis of the disease. Recent data support the fact that Parkinson’s disease start in the peripheral autonomic nervous system and/or olfactory bulb. Then, it spreads through the nervous system, affecting the lower brain stem before reaching the substantia nigra. Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease depends on the presence of bradykinesia combined with rigidity or a resting tumor. Early symptoms generally show up asymmetrically, with the absence of atypical symptoms (cerebellar signs, early severe autonomic dysfunction, vertical supranuclear palsies, or cortical sensory loss), which would be indicative of an alternative diagnosis (9). In these cases, the asymmetric onset of symptoms and a good response to levodopa support Parkinson’s diagnosis in patients. Also, they are important features to discriminate Parkinson’s disease from other form of Parkinsonism [2]. As the disease progresses, motor symptoms become more severe. Because Parkinson’s is a heterogenous disease, there have been attempts to subclassify it even more. One subclassification based on clinical characteristics suggests two subtypes: a tremor dominant Parkinson’s disease and non-tremor dominant Parkinson’s disease. A patient with tremor dominant disease predominantly lacks other motor symptoms. On the other hand, a patient with a non-tremor dominant disease may have an akinetic rigid syndrome, a postural instability disorder, and increased incidence of non-motor features. The course of the disease differs, and it has been postulated that the various subtypes have different causes and manners of development. With an advanced enough progress of the disease, both motor and non-motor symptoms may become resistant to current medications. Postural instability and freezing of gait may lead to falls and fractures [2].

IV. Non-motor symptoms

Table 1
Table 1. Non motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease
Parkinson’s disease has a variety of non-motor symptoms as shown in table 1. The variety of these symptoms resulted in Parkinson’s disease being identified as a neuropsychiatric disorder rather than just a motor disorder. Some recent studies discovered that non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease may precede other motor symptoms of the disease. Identifying these symptoms beforehand can help predict the onset of the disease [3].

i. Neuropsychiatric dysfunction

Depression Depression is a common symptom of Parkinson’s. The prevalence of major depression in patients of Parkinson’s disease ranges from 4% to 70% with a mean of 40%. Recent research suggests that most of Parkinson’s patients show symptoms of minor depression. As patient with Parkinson’s show less self-blame, guilt, sense of failure, self-destructive thoughts, and probability of committing suicide. However, anxiety, panic attacks, and anhedonia are more frequent in Parkinson’s patients. Also, depression symptoms “panic attacks” have been found to precede motor defects in about 30% of Parkinson’s patients [3]. Cognitive dysfunction Cognitive dysfunction affects every Parkinson’s disease patient. Cognitive dysfunction presents itself as frontal executive dysfunction with impaired problem solving and defective planning of goal-oriented behaviors. It also includes problems with set shifting, visual awareness, spatial awareness, learning, and memory. Community based studies concluded that 30% to 40% of patients with Parkinson’s will develop dementia. The progression of dementia has been associated with a faster progression of motor dysfunction, increased risk of nursing home placements, and increased mortality. The possible causes of Parkinson’s dementia include similar changes to Alzheimer’s, cortical Lewy body degeneration, and vascular lesions [3]. Psychosis Psychosis is another prevalent non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease. Cross sectional surveys reported a hallucination prevalence of 40% in Parkinson’s disease. Furthermore, psychosis is a contributing risk factor for nursing home placement and early emergence of psychosis has been correlated with a subsequent cognitive decline and dementia. Most of the drugs used to treat Parkinson’s disease can cause hallucinations [3].

ii. Sleep disorders

Sleep disorders are common in different types of dementia and they include difficulties falling asleep, frequent awakenings, nighttime cramping, painful dystonia, or nighttime motor symptoms with difficulties turning in bed, motor restlessness or clear-cut restless legs syndrome, night-time incontinence, nocturnal confusion, hallucinosis and daytime sleepiness. Parkinson’s disease neurodegeneration affects the sleep structure resulting in sleep fragmentation, sleep efficiency reduction, slow wave sleep declination, decreased rapid eye movement while sleeping, and rapid eye movement behavior disorder [3]. It is worth noting that rapid eye movement behavior disorder is considered a preclinical symptom of Parkinson’s disease as incidences of it are between 15% and 40% [3]. Excessive daytime sleepiness Excessive daytime sleepiness prevalence is about 51% of Parkinson’s patients. The frequency of it ranges between 3.8% and 30% [3].

iii. Autonomic dysfunction

Orthostatic hypotension Orthostatic hypotension is a late feature of Parkinson’s. A study that included 135 patients found Orthostatic hypotension in 30% of them. Another study that included 91 patients with tilt table examinations found systolic blood pressure drops of more than 20 mmHg in 58% of patients. It is worth noting that symptomatic orthostatic hypotension correlated with the dose of dopaminergic medication and the duration and severity of Parkinson’s disease. Orthostatic hypotension in patients with Parkinson’s disease is caused by Cardiac sympathetic denervation [3]. Constipation Lewy bodies affect the myenteric plexus and subsequently the colonic sympathetic denervation. This correlates with a high intestinal transit time and constipation in Parkinson’s disease. This is supported by an increased prevalence of constipation in Parkinson’s disease patients between 28% and 61%. A study found either constipation or higher intestinal transit time in 80% of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Also, a study found that constipation was noticeably reported in half of the patients before the clear onset of motor symptoms. Another study that confirms this found evidence for a 2.7-4.5 increase in the relative risk of Parkinson’s disease in males with less than bowel movement per day compared with subjects with one, two or more movements per day [3]. Urogenital dysfunction Urogenital dysfunction in Parkinson’s includes erectile and ejaculatory failure, urinary frequency and urgency, incomplete bladder emptying, double micturition and urge incontinence. It is also a late feature of Parkinson’s disease [3].

iv. Sensory symptoms and pain

Abnormal pain sensations that aren’t the result of common causes of pain in the elderly have been reported in 40% to 50% of patients with Parkinson’s disease. A study suggest that the pain sensations are caused by changes to the central pain-processing pathways. Other sensory symptoms include problems with odor detection and discrimination. It affects 90% of patients with Parkinson’s disease and it suggests a neuropathology affecting the olfactory bulbs. Furthermore, Hyposmia is found when patients are tested for it but they patients don’t spontaneously complain of it. Hyposmia doesn’t appear to progress with the Parkinson’s disease but presents itself at the start of the disease. Recent data suggest that hyposmia may be a risk factor of Parkinson’s disease [3].

V. Treatments

The only available treatments for Parkinson’s disease are symptomatic. Because the disease isn’t fully understood, no disease modifying treatments currently exist. As Parkinson’s disease is a long-term disease, patients may need to take sophisticated medications with a likelihood of side effects. The type of medication taken by Parkinson’s disease is dopaminergic to replace the action of dopamine in the striatum are the main treatment for Parkinson’s disease. These dopaminergic drugs work by metabolizing to dopamine, activating the dopamine receptor, or preventing the breakdown of endogenous dopamine. The medication courses are customized for every individual based on the severity of the symptoms and the side effects that affects them. Before we discuss the treatments, we need to know how dopamine is synthesized in the brain.

i. Dopamine biosynthesis and metabolism

Figure 2
Figure 2 shows the pathway of dopamine synthesis and metabolism.
Dopamine can only be produced in the central nervous system in order to be active in the striatum as it can’t cross the blood-brain barrier. Also, small amounts of it are produced in the medulla of the adrenal glands. Dopamine’s precursor is l-dihydroxyphenylalanine (levodopa or l-DOPA), means that it is in its free form, that is synthesized either directly from tyrosine or indirectly from phenylalanine. After the reuptake of dopamine into dopaminergic neurons or glial cells, it is metabolized. The detailed metabolic pathway is illustrated in Figure 2. Many components of the dopamine pathway were targeted for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. For example, genes encoding the rate limiting enzymes for dopamine synthesis, TH and DOPA decarboxylase, were part of an experimental gene therapy which has been trailed in PD patients. Levodopa is the basis for most of Parkinson’s disease treatment regimes, with inhibitors of metabolic enzymes MAO-B and COMT being used.

ii. Current treatments

Levodopa Levodopa based treatments are designed to replace the dopamine in the depleted striatum as dopamine can’t cross the blood brain barrier unlike its precursor levodopa. After absorption and transit across the blood brain barrier, it is converted into dopamine by DOPA decarboxylase. Most patients must take a dose of 150 to 1000 mg daily, divided into multiple doses. As it is usual practice for Parkinson’s disease patients to take a low dose of levodopa, while increasing the dose based on the patient’s response to the treatment to balance it against the experienced adverse effects. These effects of the drug are noticed quickly and may last for several hours. However, as the disease progresses in patients, the effect of the drug starts to wear off after shorter durations and there is a need to increase the frequency of taking doses. Moreover, prolonged use can result in significant motor complications, including dyskinesias, and severe on-off motor fluctuations. Another side effect of Levodopa is the on-off phenomenon, in which patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease experience rapid fluctuations in their motor function. During the on-state, motor symptoms are controlled relatively well, but the rapid wearing of the levodopa leaves the patient in the off state, where they have severe motor Parkinsonian symptoms. The causes of these symptoms are probably the variable drug absorption and transit across the blood brain barrier, and the resulting fluctuations in pre-synaptic and post-synaptic dopamine levels in the nigrostriatal pathway. Other important symptoms include gastrointestinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting, and orthostatic hypotension. Neuropsychiatric features include anxiety and hallucinations may occur due to the dopamine acting in extranigral brain regions (an off-target) [4]. Measures to counteract the side effects of levodopa include using the minimum effective dose, fractionation of the dose, and the use of alternative dopaminergic treatments. As stated before, levodopa is administered with DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors such as benserazide and carbidopa. They don’t cross the blood brain barrier, but selectively prevent the conversion of levodopa to dopamine outside the central nervous system, reducing the side effects. Benserazide and carbidopa are available in several formulations including modified release preparations, which can be useful for controlling the symptoms overnight and limiting early morning symptoms [4]. More recently, continuous intestinal infusion of levodopa gel (a combination of levodopa with carbidopa) has shown to be effective in decreasing severe motor fluctuations when compared to oral levodopa—probably the result of more consistent levodopa absorption. Furthermore, this treatment is very expensive, causing researchers to continue to focus on the development of other long-acting oral preparations as well as other modes of drug delivery [4]. Dopamine agonists Dopamine receptor agonists may be categorized into ergot and non-ergot derived depending on the receptor specificities. These drugs stimulate the activity of the dopamine system by binding to the dopaminergic receptors and, unlike levodopa, do not need to be converted into dopamine. Dopamine agonists are often prescribed as an initial therapy for younger Parkinson’s patients. This allows for a delayed use of levodopa, which may reduce the impact of the motor complications. Other drugs are available in controlled or prolonged release formulations in the form of tablets, patches, and injections. While these drugs are less effective than levodopa in controlling the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, and most patients require levodopa therapy, dopamine agonists can be useful in patients with minor symptoms, who are unable to tolerate levodopa, or as an adjunct to levodopa therapy. The drug’s duration of action varies with patients and the type of agonist prescribed. The dose of prescribed drug is usually increased with time, based on the patient’s response and the side effects experienced. Also, Apomorphine is useful in relieving severe “off” episodes as a subcutaneous injection, but not frequently. In addition, it can be used in patients with severe motor fluctuations as a subcutaneous infusion [4]. Treatment with dopamine agonists has been shown to be correlated with a reduced incidence, severity of dystonia, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesia in comparison to levodopa. However, they may cause other severe adverse effects like nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, insomnia, peripheral edema, constipation, fainting, hallucinations, sleepiness, and the development of compulsive and impulsive behavioral problems (impulsive control disorder), which is the most important side effect [4]. Monoamine Oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors Other treatment, rather than increasing the amount of dopamine in the brain, preserve the dopamine in the brain by inhibiting the enzymes involved in dopamine metabolism. One of these treatments is the monoamine oxidase B. As monoamine oxidase B is one of the main enzymes involved in the breakdown of dopamine, reducing its activity in the striatum will result in increased activity of dopamine. The use of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors relives the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Also, they are used as an initial treatment--just like dopamine agonists--to delay the use of levodopa therapy and reduce the risk of levodopa motor complications. Although they are sufficient for controlling the disease in its early phase, most of the patients inevitably require levodopa therapy. Furthermore, monoamine oxidase B inhibitors may be used in combination with levodopa treatments to reduce the levodopa dose [4]. The monoamine oxidase B inhibitors most commonly used include selegiline and rasagiline. Recently, the drug safinamide was also approved to be used in Parkinson’s disease treatment. The side effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors are well tolerated with the gastrointestinal being the most common. Other effects include aching joints, depression, fatigue, dry mouth, insomnia, dizziness, confusion, nightmares, hallucinations, flu-like symptoms, indigestion, and headache [4]. Catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors Just like the monoamine oxidase B, another enzyme involved in dopamine metabolism is catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors. They are generally used in combination with levodopa as they prolong its half-life and its delivery to the brain. They help to control the motor symptoms experienced and reduce the off time in comparison to standard levodopa/ DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors combinations. Therefore, they are administered when the effect of levodopa is wearing off quickly [4]. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors are administered in the form of tablets and are generally prescribed in combination with other treatments as they alone have a weak effect on Parkinson’s disease. Examples of it include entacapone (Comtan), tolcapone (Tasmar), and opicapone (Ongentys). Entacapone and tolcapone are often the most commonly used forms. Entacapone is used in combination with carbidopa and levodopa. It is worth noting that catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors amplify the adverse effects of levodopa like dyskinesias, and they may result in the need for the reduction of levodopa dose. Other uncommon side effects include sleepiness, nausea, loss of appetite, diarrhea, dizziness, orange urine discoloration, hallucinations, abdominal pain, headaches, confusion, dry mouth, and chest pain [4]. Anticholinergics This type of treatment differs from other discussed types of treatments. This drug uses mechanisms that aren’t designed to increase the dopaminergic activity in the brain. Anticholinergics reduce the activity of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine by acting as antagonists at cholinergic receptors. In the brain, the loss of dopaminergic neurons results in the disturbance of the normal balance between dopamine and acetylcholine. Using anticholinergic drugs may lead to restoration of the balance between the neurotransmitters. This drug is mainly used in young patients at early stages of the disease to treat mild movement symptoms like tremors and muscle stiffness. Anticholinergic drugs play a role in tremor predominant Parkinson’s disease and may be used alone in the early stages of the disease. However, they are usually used in combination with levodopa and the other discussed treatments. They are usually not given to the elderly or those with cognitive problems due to an increased risk of confusion. Anticholinergics exist in the form of tablets and liquid syrup. Examples of anticholinergics include benztropine, orphenadrine, procyclidine, and trihexyphenidyl (Benzhexol). The common side effects include blurred vision, dry mouth, constipation, drowsiness, trouble urinating, urinary retention, confusion, cognitive impairment, hallucinations, dizziness, trouble swallowing, dyskinetic movements, and memory problems [4]. Amantadine Amantadine was created as an antiviral drug for treating the flu, but is now used for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. It may be used to treat rigidity, rest tremor and sometimes fatigue, and it may offer a short-term improvement in symptoms. It may also reduce the required dose of levodopa; reducing the risk of dyskinesia. However, it is mostly known for reducing the risk of dyskinesias as a side effect of levodopa therapy, even if the evidence is insufficient to conclude whether it can be used to control Parkinsons’s disease symptoms [4]. It is unknown how amantadine may treat Parkinson’s symptoms, but it acts as a weak glutamate antagonist at the N-methyl-daspartate receptor (NMDAR). Like most of the treatments, it starts with a small dose and slowly is titrated up. It comes in the form of tablets and liquid syrup. Although, it is well tolerated, possible side effects include hallucinations, confusion and impaired concentration, livedo reticularis, leg swelling, blurred vision, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, insomnia and nightmares, sweating, agitation, and headache [4].

iii. Future treatments

There are currently no disease modifying treatments for Parkinson’s disease. However, a number of promising approaches and new medications are being developed. Also, there is a lot of interest in drug repurposing, which is using approved or experimental drugs to treat a disease outside of their original medical engineering. Because repurposed drugs have been tested previously, safety data already exist, so going through clinical trials is faster. Other approaches are in or about to enter clinical trials. These include gene therapies, such as ProSavin—a virus vector carrying the genes for DOPA decarboxylase, TH, and guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase-1 (It can cause a disease associated with Parkinson’s disease) and stem cell approaches. These aren’t disease modifying treatments but they restore dopaminergic activity in the striatum in a better manner than other available medications, with a theoretic reduced adverse effect of levodopa [4]. A lot of evidence suggests that α-synuclein—aggregates in the form of Lewy—bodies unlike β-synuclein plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Therefore, there are many researches on how it could be used in potential therapies. Therapeutic approaches have been developed to: reduce α-synuclein production, inhibit α-synuclein aggregation, increase intracellular and extracellular degradation of α-synuclein aggregates, and reduce the uptake of extracellular α-synuclein by neighboring cells [4]. Immunotherapies targeting α-synuclein are beginning to enter clinical trials. A Phase 1 chemical trial with the synthetic vaccine (a vaccine made of synthetic peptides, carbohydrates, or antigens) AFFITOPEPD03A containing α-synuclein mimicking peptide, has been completed. It was tested subcutaneously in 36 patients with early Parkinson’s disease and it was found to be well tolerated. An α- synuclein-targeting passive immunotherapeutic agent PRX002 has also been tested in Phase 1a and Phase 1b clinical trials. A 96.5% reduction in free serum levels of α-synuclein was observed. No major side effects or toxicity were observed and the drug progressed to Phase 2 clinical trials. Another α-synuclein-based passive immunotherapy called BIIB-054 was found to be well tolerated. A number of other immunotherapeutic agents are also under investigation. Furthermore, there are drugs that aim to result in increased extracellular degradation of α-synuclein are being considered as potential therapeutic options for Parkinson’s disease like Kallikrein 6. In addition to increasing α-synuclein degradation, another method would be to reduce α-synuclein production. This may be achieved through RNA interference technology. On the other hand, some studies noticed that a significant reduction of α-synuclein was associated with escalated neurotoxicity and even degeneration of nigrostriatal system. Thus, preclinical safety data will be extremely necessary. Another approach for reducing α-synuclein production involves reducing its expression at a transcriptional level. Beta-2-adrenoreceptor agonists such as clenbuterol achieved a greater than 35% reduction in α-synuclein expression in a neuroblastoma (a type of cancer that forms from immature nerve cells) cell line and in rat cortical neurons. Two drugs considered for repurposing have entered chemical trials —the chemotherapy agent, nilotinib, and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exenatide. Nilotinib is a c-Abl (a member of the Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases) tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Nilotinib reduced the α-synuclein levels in mice and provided a degree of neuroprotection. It was well tolerated by Parkinson’s patients but with a much lower dosage than what is usually prescribed for chronic myelogenous leukemia patients. Nilotinib has entered phase 2a of clinical trials in 2017 and its treatment potential is promising. However, it is poorly transported cross the blood brain barrier [4]. Similarly, exenatide is a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus that is emerging as a promising therapeutic option for Parkinson’s disease. Neuroprotective potential has been seen in preclinical models of the disease, with a constant clinical improvement observed in an initial clinical trial. It reached Phase 2 of clinical trials. Improvement of motor movements were observed and persisted even after the discontinuation of treatment [4].

VI. Conclusion

In conclusion, Parkinson’s disease has existed for a long time and has affected many people rendering them paralyzed or unable to carry on with their daily activities. Because of its many symptoms, it is very hard to deal with it without taking into account many side effects. Parkinson’s has destroyed the lives of many over the years, but now we can do more than just slow the development of the disease.

VII. References

JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors to treat neuroinflammation: A novel treatment for Parkinson Disease patients

Abstract Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, causing tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia. The neuroinflammatory phenotype of Parkinson’s disease leads to overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ due to neuroinflammation phenotype in PD patients. Pre-clinical rat models have shown that the Janus Kinase and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription pathway (JAK/STAT) are over-activated, especially IL-6, IFN-γ, and MHC Class II. In this study, it is proposed to perform a trial on 1-methyl-4-phenyl- 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated mice to test Ruxolitinib, a JAK/STAT pathway inhibitor, as a novel medication for PD patients. There will be 3 groups to test the hypothesis: The first group will be given Ruxolitinib orally at 5 mg/kg, the second group will be given the same medication at 10 mg/kg, and the third group will be vehicle-treated (control group). After 4 weeks, the treated mice will undergo immunoblotting and electrophoresis to check if MHC Class II is expressed appropriately in the control groups and compare it and the results of administering Ruxolitinib. It is expected that there will be a noticed decrease of activation of the MHC Class II in the mice after the 4 weeks. This proposal if applied could show the potential of the JAK/STAT pathway as a therapeutic target to help slow down the progression of PD.

I. Introduction

Figure 1
Figure 1: A diagram of the relation between symptoms of PD and the affected brain areas (From 22)
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative movement disorder. About 0.5- 1% of people aged 65 to 69 suffer from PD, which adds up to more than 10 million people worldwide [1]. The major symptoms of PD include tremors, stiffness of limbs, slowness of movement, and impaired balance. Parkinson’s disease is caused by loss of dopaminergic neurons in a part of the brain called substantia nigra pars compacta, which is responsible for producing dopamine, and accumulation of misfolded alpha-SYN inclusions called Lewy bodies [2]. PD patients also lose the nerve endings that produce norepinephrine, the chemical messenger that is responsible for the sympathetic nervous functions of the body. When missense mutations of the alpha-synuclein gene are introduced, it leads to the familiar forms of PD, which are characterized by increased aggregation of lewy bodies [3]. Research has shown that neuroinflammation processes in the brain play a critical factor in the pathogenesis of PD [4]. This was also evident in a research paper where FK506 had high efficacy in reducing neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in PD patients [5].
Unfortunately, there is no definitive cure for PD that reverses its effects. Patients diagnosed with PD take drugs that increase dopamine, drugs that control other chemicals in the brain, or drugs that deal with nonmotor symptoms. This is largely due to the fact that the blood-brain barrier does not allow the passing of large molecules, which means that more than 98% of novel treatments cannot be administered. Current treatments include deep brain stimulation, MRI-guided focused ultrasound, and Levodopa, which are the most effective motor treatments of the symptoms of PD [6]. Levodopa is the most used treatment for PD. However, levodopa only stops the tremors caused by Parkinson’s disease, but not the progression of the disease itself. Additionally, it has serious side-effects. Patients treated with Levodopa often have levodopa-induced dyskinesia, involuntary adventitious movements caused by prolonged treatment with levodopa [7]. Levodopa takers have to take another medication along with it called Carbidopa, which only decreases the side effects of Levodopa. Other symptoms treatments include dopamine agonists that mimic the role of dopamine, MAO-B inhibitors that slow down dopamine breakdown, COMT inhibitors that help break down dopamine, Amantadine that reduces involuntary movements, and anticholinergic drugs that reduce muscle rigidity and tremors [8]. Thus, novel treatments for Parkinson’s disease need to be urgently found to help slow it down. In this research proposal, we will explore the prescription of Ruxolitinib, an ATP-competitive of JAK/STAT pathway, on Parkinson’s disease. Trials have shown that Ruxolitinib passes the blood-brain barrier successfully in phase 3 trials of HIV-1 infection [9] and is also FDA-approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera [10]. It has never been tested before for Parkinson’s disease, but it has a high chance to be an effective medication to help slow it down.

II. Research Aims

Figure 2
Figure 2: A diagram of the ventral midbrain and its components [From 23]
Due to the accumulating evidence that the JAK/STAT pathway disrupts the neuroinflammation and causes neurodegeneration of Parkinson’s disease, it was hypothesized that by inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway in patients, it could help slow the progression of PD. Ruxolitinib will be tested on MPTP mice models of PD to observe their efficacy as they both inhibit protein tyrosine kinases JAK 1 and 2, which could potentially help mitigate the neuroinflammation and increased a-synuclein levels in the brain.

III. Research Hypothesis

Levels of MHC Class II will decline by inhibiting the JAK/STAT pathway using Ruxolitinib, indicating that Parkinson’s disease progression is slowed down.

IV. Methodology

The hypothesis postulated in this proposal will be tested in mice. These mice will be chemically induced with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6- tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) to simulate Parkinson’s Disease. The complete protocol that Jackson-Lewis proposed will be followed to ensure the induction of Parkinson’s disease in mice models [11]. Ruxolitinib will be dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) in approximately 5 mg/ml solubility. They will be divided into 3 groups. The first group will be given Ruxolitinib orally at 5 mg/kg, the second group will be given Ruxolitinib also at 10 mg/kg, and the third group will be given dimethyl formamide because they will be the vehicle-treated group. This medication will be given to the MPTP-mice models using oral gavages daily for 2 weeks. After the induction, the presence of Parkinson’s disease will be measured in the mice by applying the following methodology to measure if the levels of MHC Class II protein were over-activated. Also, akinesia, rigidity, tremor, gait and posture disturbances should be observed in MPTP-induced mice.
Figure 3
Figure 3: Apparatus used to run electrophoresis [From 24]
After the treatment period is finished, each animal will be deeply anesthetized using isoflurane. To begin, thirty micrograms of the ventral midbrain, which is shown in figure 2 of the mice will be lysed using ice-cold cell lysis buffer and a homogenizer. To maintain the brain’s state, it would be kept in a tissue collection solution (50% 0.01 moles of cold phosphate-buffered saline and 50% glycerol) and stored -20C for immunoblotting. The immunoblotting process is a technique that will be used for the analysis of the concentration of MHC Class II proteins in the ventral midbrain. It will also be used to measure the concentration of STAT1 and STAT3 using their respective antigens to test that the pathway is inhibited. The sample will be subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to separate the proteins of the cell sample by size using an electroporator with 10% stacking gel solution as shown in figure 3. 140 volts will be applied to the sample to allow efficient separation. The results will be compared to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase as it is expressed at all levels in electrophoresis. The slowing down of the progression of Parkinson’s disease will be probed using antibodies of MHC Class II proteins [12].

Correspondingly, the JAK/STAT pathway inhibition will be measured by probing STAT1 and STAT3 using anti-STAT1 and anti-STAT3.

Afterwards, the separated sample will be electro transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PDVF) membrane by creating a transfer sandwich. The transfer sandwich will be composed of a sponge, 3 filter papers, gel, PVDF membrane, 3 more filter papers in a sandwich structure as shown in figure 4. By placing electrodes on top of the sandwich and applying current, the cell sample on the gel will transfer onto the membrane because it will travel from the cathode to the anode. Lastly, the expression of the MHC Class II will be observed through observing the results in a dark room as the antibodies would be prepared with chemiluminescence.

V. Discussion

Figure 4
Figure 4: A diagram showing the filter papers in a
In this research proposal, it is suggested to investigate the efficacy of treating Parkinson’s Disease with inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway. inson’s disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that is caused by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta in the midbrain. In PD patients, inclusions of aggregated a- synuclein (a-SYN) are prominent in dopaminergic neurons. Microglia exhibit pro-inflammatory properties in Parkinson’s Disease. Post-mortem studies of Parkinson’s disease patients have shown a correlation between activated microglia levels and MHC Class II expression levels, which is known to correlate with the level of alpha-synuclein [13]. This observation was evident in many experiments in vivo and vitro. For instance, overexpression of alpha- synuclein in substantia nigra of models for PD, leading to the up-regulation of MHC Class II protein in microglia [14]. Also, known pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β, IFN-y, and TNF-α were detected in the striatum of PD patients as they are known for their role in neuroinflammation.
Figure 5
Figure 5: The crystallographic structure of the src homology 2 (SH2) domain that is present in the STAT protein. The SH2 mediates heterodimer formation in the JAK/STAT pathway. The structure consists of a large beta sheet (green color) flanked by two alpha-helices (orange and blue) [From 26]
The Janus Kinase/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway is a signaling pathway used by cytokines to initiate innate immunity, orchestrate adaptive immune mechanisms, and constrain inflammatory responses. This pathway is made up of three major proteins: cell-surface receptors, JAKs, and STATs. Once a cytokine binds to the pathway receptor, receptor associated JAKs phosphorylate a tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic domain of the cytokine receptor [15]. This provides a docking site for STATs. After that, two STAT proteins bind to the receptor via its SH2 domains, as shown in figure 5, and are phosphorylated by the SH2-phosphate interactions between JAK and STAT proteins, inducing dimerization. The dimer then translocates from the cytoplasm into the nucleus, binds to specific elements of DNA, and regulates the expression of certain cytokine-responsive genes (16). A summary of this pathway is shown in figure 6. In mammals, four JAKs (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and JAK4) and seven STATs (STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6) have been identified.
Figure 6
Figure 6: Diagram of the JAK/STAT pathway [From 27]
Pre-clinical models have shown that the IFN-γ and IL-6 are elevated in Parkinson’s Disease patients, which are one of the most potent activators of the JAK/STAT pathway [14, 17].This shows the essential link between JAK/STAT pathway, neuroinflammation, and Parkinson’s disease. Thus, the JAK/STAT pathway is an important factor for the development of PD.
Figure 7
Figure 7: The chemical structure of the medication Ruxolitinib. This medication is proposed for Parkinson’s disease patients because it is a known JAK ½ inhibitor. The chemical formula is C17H18N6 [From 28]
Therefore, we propose to test Ruxolitinib as a novel medication for Parkinson’s disease in mice models. Ruxolitinib was chosen specifically because it is an oral JAK inhibitor that binds to protein tyrosine kinases JAK 1 and 2. Furthermore, trials have also shown that Ruxolitinib passes the blood- brain barrier successfully in phase 3 trials of HIV-1 infection [9] and is also FDA-approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera [10]. Its mechanism of action in treating Parkinson’s disease patients has not been researched before, but we predict it would be similar to its predicted mechanism of action for myelofibrosis patients.
Figure 8
Figure 8: Ruxolitinib, called Jakafi in this figure, binds to the JAK1 and JAK2 and inhibits it, which prevents it from mediating the signaling of cytokines in the cell. This should hypothetically help slow down progression of Parkinson’s disease [From 29]
Ruxolitinib’s chemical formula structure is shown in figure 7. It is predicted to bind to the JAK1 and JAK2 in the JAK/STAT pathway as an ATP-competitive inhibitor, inhibiting its ability to phosphorylate tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic domain of the cytokine receptor as shown in figure 8. These medications are proposed to be tested on MPTP mice model, which are characterized by abnormal amounts of alpha-synuclein phosphorylated at Ser129 as well as nitrosylated alpha-synuclein. These mice experience 91% destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta [18]. MPTP is a lipophilic protoxin that has been shown to pass the blood-brain barrier before [19]. MPTP is converted by Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) into an intermediary, and then finally converted into MPP+. Following its release into the extracellular space, MPP+ is taken up into dopaminergic neurons where MPP+ is accumulated in the mitochondria, causing impairing of complex I of the electron transport chain. Consequently, this leads to a reduction of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production and generation of reactive oxygen species, initiating SNPc degeneration [20].
The MPTP injection will induce activation of MHC Class II in the substantia nigra pars compacta, simulating PD. The JAK/STAT pathway inhibitor, Ruxolitinib, should inhibit the activation of those genes, helping slow down the neurodegeneration of Parkinson’s Disease. Through the use of immunoblotting and electrophoresis, MHC Class II levels will be detected [21]. This will allow us to test our hypothesis accurately and measure our results by comparing it with the vehicle treated-MPTP mice that will be given DMF.

VI. Expected Results

According to evidence from past research papers of PD models, by inscribing JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors, Ruxolitinib, to MPTP mice models, there should be a noticed change of activation of the MHC Class II, which correlates with alpha-synuclein in the animals over the following 4 weeks. In the immunoblotting results, the MHC Class II protein should be expressed after MPTP treatment but will be strongly inhibited by the Ruxolitinib treatment.

VII. Conclusion

Knowing that the JAK/STAT pathways play an essential role in Parkinson’s disease as many studies showed, the therapeutic potential of tackling the pathway is explored. This has been proposed to be done using JAK 1/2 inhibitors called Ruxolitinib. These novel medications in doses of 5 mg will be administered daily to MPTP-treated mice models of Parkinson’s Disease for 2 weeks. Using immunoblotting, the ventral midbrain will be examined to compare between them as control groups would have abnormal levels of STAT1 and STAT3 protein expression while mice treated with inhibitors will have less. Upon successful completion of this trial, PD therapeutics will be revolutionized. As of future plans, the project shall escalate if successful to be tested on MPTP-induced primates. This will allow us to better test tolerance in primates and observe the drug’s efficacy on Parkinsonism in primates. Depending on the results of this trial, the next step will be determined. If successful for PD patients, the drug shall be passed onto for Phase I trials where it will test the drug and dosage on 20 to 100 healthy volunteers. The purpose of this phase will be mainly to make sure we have the safe dosage range. The second phase of clinical trials involves recruiting a small sample of PD patients with various disease severities to determine major and minor side effects and efficacy in PD populations. The main purpose of this phase will be to measure its efficacy in slowing down the progression of Parkinson’s disease and side-effects. This step could take more than 2 years. If these patients show positive results that support the hypothesis, we will look forward into further trials with increasing number of PD patients to measure its safety and efficacy.

Acknowledgements

VIII. References

Alzheimer (symptoms, treatment)

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease is a common disease among the elders and has existed for many years. It is the the neurodegenerative disease that has the highest probability of causing dementia. It has affected many people and left them in a miserable state. Over the years, we discovered a lot about it and how it affects our bodies. In this paper, I present a summary of the symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease and its current and future treatments.

I. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia (about 60% of all dementia cases are Alzheimer’s disease). Dementia is the loss of cognitive functioning — thinking, remembering, and reasoning — to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities. The difference between dementia and Alzheimer’s is that dementia is an umbrella for multiple symptoms while alzheimer’s is progressive disease of the brain that slowly causes impairment in memory and cognitive function. Furthermore, it affects about 1% of 60-year-olds, and the prevalence increases to 35% between 90-year-olds [4]. Therefore, the study of Alzheimer’s disease has become a medical necessity. According to the Amyloid hypothesis, the primary cause of Alzheimer’s is the clustering of β amyloid into oligomers which is toxic. It is called β amyloid because of βsecretase which is the only secretase that creates β amyloid. β amyloid results from the cleavage of the protein β amyloid precursor protein by β secretase and γ secretase enzymes. This causes a cascading effect that results in tau hyperphosphorylation and folding into tangles. These tangles cause the death of nerve cells and ultimately cognitive decline [4]. Alzheimer’s disease is heterogeneous which makes it very hard to identify in its early stages. Some criteria were created by the (NINDS) to identify the disease. However, many neuropsychiatric symptoms get mixed with cognitive defects, making it hard to study the disease’s symptoms. The state of treatments isn’t any better. The treatments are only symptomatic, and many new treatments are still experimental.

II. Symptoms

The symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease have different aspects: neurological, neuropsychiatric, and behavioral aspects.

i. Neurologic symptoms

Alzheimer’s disease is determined by the existence of plaques and tau tangles (also know as Neurofibrillary tangles) in the brain. However, that is not the only neurological characteristic of it. Other effects characterized by the (NINDS) include myoclonus, unintentional reflexes (like grasp reflex), seizures, and muscle ton increment like the Parkinsonian cogwheel rigidity [1]. Several studies made a connection between myoclonus (involuntary twitching/jerking of the muscles) and increased severity in later stages of the disease. A study showed that the age at which the disease was acquired and the age of death of patients with myoclonus was lower than those who didn’t have myoclonus [1]. Previous studies diagnosed pathologic grasp reflex(the involuntary grasping of the hand due to moving and object along the palm) in about 0% to 100% of Alzheimer disease’s patients. However, they don’t only belong to one type of dementia. A study concluded that cognitive impairment was worse in patients with grasp reflex. Also, they have evidence that the cause of grasp reflex is related to pathologic changes in the frontal lobes [1]. Generalized motor seizures are a late symptom of Alzheimer’s disease patients showing extreme neuronal degeneration. The rate of generalized motor seizures of past studies ranged between 9% and 22% [1]. Rigidity has been described in 6% to 78% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and a correlation between the severity of the rigidity and alzheimer was made. On the other hand, myoclonus was observed in less than 5% to 55% of Alzheimer’s disease patients [1].

ii. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and how they affect the development of dementia

Patients with dementia develop neuropsychiatric symptoms (psychiatric symptoms of cognitive defects), and Alzheimer’s disease is no exception to this rule. There is a debate in the scientific community on whether the elderly with neuropsychiatric symptoms have a higher risk of developing mild cognitive impairment, and whether treating these symptoms can delay or prevent the progression to mild cognitive impairment and dementia. There is a correlation between Alzheimer’s disease and different types of neuropsychiatric symptoms like delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, agitation, anxiety, depression, and aggression [3]. Some explanations of delusions associated with it is an increase in muscarinic receptors in the orbitofrontal cortex. A study also found some correlations between delusions, reduced glucose metabolism in the right frontal cortex of the brain, and poor insight. Furthermore, other positron emission topography examinations suggested correlations between altered glucose metabolism and symptoms like apathy, anxiety, agitation, and disinhibition. Moreover, higher dopamine receptor availability is correlated with neuropsychiatric symptoms like blunted effect and emotional withdrawal in people with Alzheimer’s disease [3]. Data from a study confirmed that people with mild cognitive impairment-who have a high chance of developing Alzheimer’s disease are different than controls with respect to irritability, depression, apathy, and anxiety [5]. Another study has evidence that anxiety is a risk factor of Alzheimer’s disease progression and it associated anxiety with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid levels of β amyloids and tau protiens. In addition, there is data suggesting that people with comorbidities like depression and high blood pressure together have a 2.5 increased risk of dementia. Other data correlates the existence of diabetes, depression, and apathy with an increased risk of dementia [3]. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients of Alzheimer’s disease isn’t equally distributed between people. For example, 30% of Alzheimer disease’s patients have delusions and hallucinations. Moreover, 40% of patients have a mild dysthymic condition. The most common delusions that were observed on patients include being robbed, having an invisible border in their home, feeling the familiar person is an imposter, infideling of the spouse, and being abandoned by a caregiver. Most of these delusions had paranoid themes and, on some occasions, they may lead to patients committing suicide. Also, mild dysthymia was found to be common in Alzheimer disease’s patients. Explanations of these psychiatric symptoms probably have psychodynamic or biological origins or both [2].

III. Treatments

The methods of treatment of Alzheimer’s disease are not that varied and only depend on one scientific basis which is using cholinesterase inhibitors. However, new treatments that focus on delaying or preventing the disease completely are being tested clinically and with time we may come across a breakthrough.

i. Available treatments

It was noted by the scientific community that cholinergic systems (neurons in which acetylcholine functions as neurotransmitters) in the basal forebrain are the first to get affected. The three current treatments for Alzheimer’s disease, approved by the (FDA), are donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine. They are cholinesterase inhibitors that delay the degradation of cholinergic systems. A study of the efficacy of rivastigmine reported that patients who started the drug earlier than others achieved better cognitive performance. However, these only demonstrate modest to consistent benefit for cognitive ability. They don’t prevent the disease or slow its progression [5]. A different treatment using a different mechanism, which is memantine that protects against excitotoxicity. Using this treatment is an option for moderate to severe Alzheimer’s patients.

ii. Behavioral and psychological treatments

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors like fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, citalopram, and fluvoxamine are considered the best antidepressants for comorbid depression. Selective noradrenaline and serotonin inhibitors like mirtazapine, venlafaxine, and duloxetine are all commonly used antidepressants. A study concluded that using antidepressants with usual care may cause destructive effects and that their use must be reconsidered [4]. Antipsychotics are used to lessen the effect of the psychotic symptoms and agitation of Alzheimer’s disease. Preferably used antipsychotics are olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole because of their weak parkinsonian effects. However, people with dementia who take psychotics have higher mortality. Also, taking antipsychotics may be related to a higher risk of pneumonia, hip fracture, and cognitive defects [4]. Benzodiazepines (organic compounds that are heterocylic and used as tranquilizers) are used to lessen the agitation and anxiety of patients. However, they can also trigger further greater agitation in older people. Also, a greater dose of benzodiazepines has been associated with a higher cognitive decline [4]. Anticonvulsant drugs like carvamazepine reduce BPSD in Alzheimer’s disease [4].

iii. Disease-modifying treatments

Disease-modifying treatments focus on preventing or treating the disease by diminishing the underlying causes of the disease like vaccinations. Some treatments like tramiprosate, colostrinin, and scyllo-inositold focus on interfering with amyloid β clustering but they haven’t shown any promising results. Chelators of Zn/Cu were used to make treatments like PBT2. It stops the Cu2+ and the Zn2+ mediated toxic oligomerization (the process of turning β amyloid into oligomers). Patients showed cognitive improvements using PBT2 especially if 250 mg is administered. Other modifying treatments focused on inhibiting secretase but to no avail. However, there is a promising secretase inhibitor called avagacestat that is still going through trials. Another method is secretase potentiation (unlike secretase, it doesn’t cause toxic side effects). Etazolate is an example of this method of treatment. It was found to be generally safe [4]. Also, vaccines targeting the β amyloid pathway, are being tested clinically and are very promising. They interfere with the creation process of β amyloid to stop it from becoming toxic using different mechanisms [5]. Solanzumab involves passive vaccination of antibodies, but unlike other passive vaccinations, it didn’t worsen intracerebral hemorrhage or vascular pathology in mice. Natural amyloid antibodies were found in intravenous immunoglobulins from the plasma of donors. In a study about this discovery, 7 people were treated using it. After 6 months, cognitive decline stopped completely in all seven patients and improved in 6. More research is being done on this new kind of treatment [4]. There are clinical trials for medications that interfere with tau accumulation in tangles. A phenothiazine, methylene blue (also called methylthioninium chloride) has been used in humans and positive results have emerged of phase II of clinical trials. Other drugs interfere with tau phosphorylation. Kinases are the enzymes that cause the hyperphosphorylation of tau. Kinase inhibitors like lithium target glycogen synthase kinase 3 and can potentially stop it from phosphorylating tau protein [4]. Recent data on tumor necrosis factor (a gliotransmitter) discovered that it has strong effects on synaptic physiology. A tumor necrosis factor inhibitor called etanercept was tested with patients diagnosed with mild to severe Alzheimer’s disease [5]. The results showed rapid and constant improvements in cognitive abilities [5].

IV. Conclusion

Alzheimer’s disease is a form of dementia that affects old people. Although it was diagnosed a long time ago, it is still a hard disease to deal with. After a long time of researching the disease, symptoms and treatments alike were discovered. Finally, some breakthroughs were made and there is a chance that soon, Alzheimer’s will just be a relic of the past.

V. References

Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: How the beta-amyloid hypothesis (Aβ) cannot be the best framework for understanding, addressing, and treating Alzheimer's disease.

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive chronic neurodegenerative disease caused mainly by a genetic mutation in the brain. The beta-amyloid hypothesis is a leading hypothesis that has been widely-accepted throughout the years .It indicates that clumps of beta-amyloid particles, which are cleaved from the protein APP on the neuronal membrane by an external enzyme known as beta-secretase, are the primary cause of AD. Despite the accuracy and extensive research on this particular theory, clinical trials and drug tests that specifically target (Aβ) almost never succeed in producing a medication that treats the disease from the core rather than just its symptoms like other medications on the market at the time, like memantine. The debate over the reliability of the beta-amyloid theory and the disappointing results of therapeutic trials for AD will be covered in this paper. Moreover, other researchers have chosen a different path in their quest to learn more about possible explanations for AD. This paper will also go over some of the research done to demonstrate the pathological relationship and even the role of Aβ disposition in the brain.

I. Introduction

Figure 1
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the world’s most common cause of death after heart disease. Dementia on the other hand is caused by Alzheimer’s disease. Every 3 seconds, someone in the world develops dementia, and there are currently 55 million people living with dementia globally.[1] It begins with a damage in main memory and progresses to difficulty performing even the most basic actions, such as urinating and swallowing. Since AD is the most frequent cause of dementia [1], numerous explanations have been put forth during the past ten years, genetics is the theory that best explains it, although there are other theories such as environment, immunity, or heredity. In Particular, 40 genes are linked to cause AD risks [2], some of the most common are APP, PSEN1, PSEN2. These genes provide the explanation for how Alzheimer's disease arises, although the validity of this idea, known as the beta-amyloid theory (Aβ), is currently being debated by scientists and researchers. According to this theory, a rise in Aβ production triggers a chain of events, also known as a cascade, that eventually leads to neurodegeneration and dementia. Most scientific studies consider the Aβ theory as the primary explanation for the disease and act upon it while trying to design a drug which targets plaques of amyloid; However, it might merely be the initial source of subsequent immunological or physiological processes that result in the well-known symptoms of AD [3].

II. The beta-amyloid hypothesis and its interpretations

The amyloid precursor protein (APP), a type I transmembrane glycoprotein, is broken down to produce the Aβ peptide. A type of extracellular protease known as the α-secretase typically cleaves the APP near to the membrane. This releases a soluble extracellular fragment. These cleaved parts are soluble therefore, they can be recycled and used again.[3] However, in AD, β-secretase takes the role of α-secretase and cleaves the sticky and insoluble portion of APP, now known as the beta amyloid (Aβ). Aβ plaques are created when these clingy monomers clump together.

These plaques cause substantial disruption to memory formation by blocking the synaptic cleft, a tiny space where neurons communicate electrically and chemically. This space is where these plaques cause damage to neurons. Additionally, these plaques trigger an immunological response with the help of microglia, which are immune cells in the brain. This may result in inflammation and further harm the neurons.

Figure 2
Peptide bond cleavage is carried out by the transmembrane protein known as β-secretase. Scientists conducted preliminary tests on transgenic animal models, or animals whose genomes have been altered for use in gene research, such as mice, to test the validity of this hypothesis. In the case of studying AD, scientists have chosen mice according to some criteria, such as how they identify familial forms of AD. Transgenic mice don’t make the same plaques as humans do; however, they show neuronal degeneration and inflammation due to the toxicity of Aβ. Even the plaques [7] formed in the brains of mice are obvious figure microscopically like humans. (As shown in figure 1). An impairment in spatial learning and memory was seen when the transgenic mice were bred with Tg APP, transgenic amyloid precursor protein, as shown by a water maze test.

These observations imply that cognitive abnormalities seen in other Tg APP animals may also occur prior to A plaque formation like when these mice are assessed at various intervals. [6]

III. Clinical trials that had failed the beta-amyloid hypothesis

i. vaccination:

Figure 3
A pharmaceutical company named Alan has chosen to treat AD by training the immune system to recognise the pathogen, in this case the amyloid plaques, and learn how to eliminate them, acting on the amyloid hypothesis and attempting to target Aβ plaques. To test their vaccine and determine whether it might truly help, they injected mild and moderate AD patients. To create their antigenic components, they created short peptides that mimicked various native Aβ sequences. [8] The ones used in AD vaccinations are only 6 amino acids long, preventing the activation of Aβ-specific auto-reactive T-cells. This makes them exceedingly specific and focuses them solely on Aβ, preventing any cross-reactivity with APP. Unfortunately, this approach was unsuccessful since four patients who were included in the trial's second phase experienced aseptic meningoencephalitis,[10] a type of inflammation brought on by bacterial cultures in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Upon these trials, the corporation suspended the remaining phases after noticing significant side effects. [9]

ii. Solanezumab (synthetics antibody):

Figure 4
An amyloid-targeting antibody called Solanezumab was created in 2006 by the company Lilly, while another antibody called Bapineuzumab was being produced by Johnson & Johnson in collaboration with Pfizer. An antibody is the result of the body's immune response when a pathogen gets in the blood, in this case the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These companies have separately sought out 5000 AD patients in the mild and moderate phases. They both conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which one group received the actual medication while the other received a placebo. Following that, a test was conducted to see whether there was a relationship between mental state and the deposition of Aβ using florbetapir positron-emission tomography (PET) or an Aβ-42 measurement in CSF. [11] Patients were assigned to be injected with 400 mg of solanezumab or a placebo every four weeks for 76 weeks, using a score range from 0 to 90, with a higher score indicating greater cognitive impairment. According to the results of this trial, solanezumab, which was given to patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease for four weeks, had no noticeable impact on cognitive impairment. According to its claims, Solanezumab was created to accelerate the removal of soluble Aβ from the brain, supporting the Aβ hypothesis of AD, which holds that the condition is brought on by an excess or inadequate removal of Aβ. (or both). The amyloid hypothesis will need to be taken into account in the context of the findings from this trial and other clinical trials of anti-amyloid treatments. They stated: “If amyloid is not the cause of this disease, Solanezumab would not be expected to slow disease progression.” [12]

iii. BACE inhibitors:

Figure 5
The β-secretase enzyme previously stated that cleaves APP and releases C99 fragments that form various species of Aβ peptide is known as BACE, or beta-amyloid cleaving enzyme. In patients with mild and moderate stages of AD, a BACE inhibitor inhibits the first enzymatic step of Aβ production. The inhibitors target these enzymes and stop their work that needs a subsequent course of immunological therapy to remove the amyloid. However, safety concerns persisted as a side effect related with the elimination of Aβ, which was dose-dependent and happened more frequently in ApoE allele 4 carriers than non-carriers. This was demonstrated by monitoring the Aβ levels in the CSF. ApoE, a protein that moves lipids throughout the body, is available in three different forms: e2, e3, and e4. If someone has the e4 allele from either parent, their chance of developing AD is up to 3 or 4 times higher than that of the general population. However, if they have the ApoE 4 allele from both parents, their risk is up to 10 to 14 times higher than that of the general population. [13]

IV. The pathological hypothesis as another suggested theory

Other researchers have dug up to see if there was another approach to explore the AD brain since the results of these clinical trials points to the possibility that the amyloid theory may be incorrect. They followed a completely different road, which was pathology.They used mathematical models by collecting information from brain banks, collection of brain tissue samples from people who donated their brains after they die for research purposes. [14] They have compared healthy brain tissue to people who had plaques and tangles in their brains but didn’t have symptoms yet. They specifically looked for networks of genes that were behaving very differently in AD, such as APP, PSEN1, PSEN2. It was suggested that a link is present between viral infections and plaque formation in animal models .They concentrated on specimens from the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus, areas of the brain known to have the most severe neuronal loss in AD. [15]
These samples encouraged them to propose an alternative model for AD, clarifying that the amyloid theory is only a factor, not a cause. For further examination, they have checked for 500 viruses in 4 different brain regions in over 600 brain samples. Two viruses in particular, which are types of herpes virus, were elevated in AD brains that may be a correlation too. They support the theory that Herpesviridae infection might encourage amyloid-amyloidosis, the formation of plaques.These findings with earlier researchers, found a substantial association between HSV-1 and AD. The virus has also been found in amyloid plaques in brain autopsy of AD. [16] Other researchers discovered that the severity of the sickness increased with the amount of genetic material that viruses had deposited in people's brains. It's possible that minor variations in people's DNA are enabling the viruses to cause more harm. According to their theory, people who are more susceptible to AD are likely to have a combination of a viral infection and a specific genetic predisposition. They also conducted an experiment in which they eliminated a gene that one of these viruses had rejected, which resulted in an increase in brain plaques. These findings clearly imply that viruses are at least largely responsible for the disease, but they do not confirm causation. [17]

V. Conclusion

In conclusion, it is perfectly feasible that AD is brought on or progresses in many ways; consequently, the virus may be implicated in some cases but not others, and a person's immune system may also be engaged. Additionally, measuring AD from a single angle is ineffective for identifying its causes or finding a suitable medication to treat it. There are several reasons why these trials fail, some of which include: selection of the wrong patient population, Variability in clinical progression rate,Inadequate dosage or exposure to drugs, The wrong time to intervene and The clinical scales' lack of sensitivity.

VI. References

Stem Cell Therapies and Neurodegeneration Diseases

Abstract Alzheimer's and Parkinson’s disease are disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of neurons. These diseases are called neurodegeneration diseases. Neurodegenerative diseases and the lack of curative therapies are social and medical issues to deal with. As stem cell technologies are getting more advanced and interesting, scientists are taking advantage of them in the medical field. Stem cell therapy is an alternative option to cure neurodegenerative diseases. They are like immunomodulators and neuroprotectors. This paper will discuss stem cell therapies for treating such disorders as well as some of their applications.

I. Introduction

Neurodegenerative disease is a disorder in which neurons and glial cells of the brain and spinal cord are lost, and it has acute and chronic conditions. In acute cases, as in response to a stroke or spinal cord injury, different types of nerve cells and glial cells die within a limited brain area over a short period of time. In chronic cases, it is either a selective loss of specific cells, such as dopamine neurons in Parkinson's disease and motor neurons in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis or the degeneration of many types of neurons, as in Alzheimer's disease, over several years [1].
Figure 1
Figure 1: Stem cells' differentiation.
As in figure 1, stem cells can replicate themselves and differentiate into other kinds of cells (like neurons, muscle cells, and blood cells) as in figure 1. Stem cell-based therapy is a new kind of treatment that has emerged over the past few decades. The treatment of neurodegenerative diseases is extremely complicated. However, stem cell-based therapy can still give hope. Stem cells that are prepared in labs can substitute the lost nerve and glial cells by simulating the adult central nervous system to form new neurons and glial cells [2].

II. Stem cells strategies

Stem cell therapies are known as regenerative medicine; scientists have come up with some techniques to use stem cells to treat serious diseases by using their differentiation ability. Researchers prepare stem cells in labs, then manipulate them to specialize into the needed cells, such as heart cells or nerve cells. For a heart disease patient, the specialized cells could be implanted into the heart muscle. The healthy implanted cells could restore the function of the heart [3]. Embryonic stem cells may be used to treat some medical conditions like neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic spinal cord injury, stroke, severe burns, rheumatoid arthritis, heart disease, hearing loss, and retinal disease. California’s Stem Cell Agency provides research about some programmed trials to use stem cell therapies. [4]. Stem cell therapies may be the only treatment for neurodegenerative diseases that offers a structural and functional cure. Cell transplantation and neuroprotection are the two most common strategies to treat neurodegenerative diseases.

i. Cell Transplantation

Figure 2
Cell transplantation is a well-known technique in stem cell therapies; it is done by inserting stem cells instead of donor organs into the body. It has the potential to treat many diseases by using adult stem cells to replace cells damaged as in leukemia (as in figure 2). After chemotherapy and radiation are complete, stem cells are delivered into the bloodstream through a tube called a central venous catheter. Then, they travel to the bone marrow and restore its function to produce blood cells and platelets [3, 5]. For neurodegenerative diseases, transplanted cells are integrated into host tissue, making synapses reshape the neural networks like the original. But this approach has limited effectiveness due to the problems associated with differentiation, neural network recreation, and subsequent formation of a functional network [6].

ii. Neuroprotection

Neuroprotection is a mechanism that refers to defending the central nervous system against any injury due to both acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. It slows down the loss of neurons and supports the remaining neurons, which is more practical than cellular replacement. It is preferred to Sclerosis treat Amyotrophic Lateral-explanation, which is widely involved in the neural axis and can support the remaining motor neurons [6].

III. Applications

i. Alzheimer's disease

Figure 3
Alzheimer's disease is characterized by memory loss from neuronal degeneration, cognitive decline, and dementia. It occurs due to the widespread loss of neurons and destruction of synaptic networks throughout the brain cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and basal forebrain (look at figure 3). Usually, the patient’s brain has pathologic marks, which are beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaque and neurofibrillary tangle. A neurofibrillary tangle is formed by hyperphosphorylation of a microtubule-associated protein known as tau [6].
urrent treatment options for Alzheimer's are centered on regulating neurotransmitter activity. Stem cell therapies target the cholinergic system in order to provide environmental enrichment. The enhancement of cholinergic function improves its behavioral and cognitive defects. Due to the fact that neurogenesis in the hippocampus decreases as we age, therapies that protect the neurons, increase neurogenesis, and replace lost cells may slow down the progression of the disease or completely stop it. Stem cell-therapies show good results in animal models; however, there is only one completed clinical trial, which was a phase I study performed at Samsung Medical Center [6].

ii. Parkinson’s disease

Figure 4
Figure SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 4: A Parkinson’s disease old man. You can observe the tremor in his hands and the slow unbalanced movements.
Parkinson’s disease results from the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Patients suffer from several motor symptoms, including unstable gait and posture, tremors, and muscle rigidity (look at figure 4) [4]. Lewy bodies are the main characteristic of Parkinson’s disease; they are clumps of alpha-synuclein in the midbrain, and the brain stem [6]. Levodopa, a dopamine precursor, neural lesion surgery, and deep brain stimulation are considered current treatments. These treatments are effective early in the disease, but they are symptomatic, which means they have harmful long-term effects [6].
Cell-based therapies for Parkinson’s disease focus on the replacement of lost dopaminergic neurons. Embryonic Stem Cells and mesenchymal stem cells were differentiated into dopaminergic neurons and then grafted into rat models, showing an improvement in their function. Patients’ dopaminergic neurons can be used to treat Parkinson’s disease with induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Transplantation of these patients’ specific neurons into a rodent model has shown significant functional recovery. Mesenchymal stem cells transplantations are the most suitable for the clinical setting for their neurotrophic and immunomodulatory effects and potential. In a rat model, mesenchymal stem cells transplantation had a protective effect against dopaminergic neuronal death. Also, neuroprotection can be useful in supporting the existence of dopaminergic neurons and slowing disease progression. A combination of cellular replacement and neuroprotection may improve the efficacy of cell therapies for Parkinson’s. Some clinical trials have shown that stem cell therapies are safe and effective for patients [6].

IV. Conclusion

Neurodegenerative diseases have bad impacts on the community. For decades, medical experts have studied how to decrease the burden of neurodegenerative diseases, and some strategies are being discussed according to safety and ethical concerns. Stem cell therapies still do not fulfill the medical needs for such diseases, but they give hope that there will be a cure. Currently, there are not many practical results for stem cell-based therapies and their effectiveness on neurodegenerative diseases; it may take several years to come up with the best treatment.

V. References

Music Therapy: Presenting New Medical Treatments for Neurological Diseases

Abstract A time-based sound art that communicated thoughts and emotions in meaningful ways via rhythm, melody, harmony, colour, tones, or sounds used in a single line (melody) or many lines (harmony) and heard or to be sounded by one or more voices, instruments, or both are all definitions of music. Music is more than some tones; music can help treat some severe diseases and significantly impact the physical and mental state of the person, which can be called music therapy. Music therapy is an allied health profession, " the clinical and evidence-based use of music treatments to achieve customised objectives within a therapeutic relationship by a certified practitioner who has completed an accredited music therapy curriculum." Music therapy is a diverse discipline. Music therapists use music-based experiences to address client needs in one or more of the following domains of human functioning: cognitive, academic, emotional/psychological; behavioural; communication; social; physiological (sensory, motor, pain, neurological, and other physical systems), spiritual, and aesthetics. This research paper aims to cover how the human brain understands and processes sound, specifically music.

I. Introduction

The brain is a complicated structure made up of linked parts. The brain's structural and functional connections have the characteristics of complex networks and may be studied using theoretical graph methods. [1] Vibrations from a sound system pass through the air and enter the ear canal. These vibrations irritate the eardrum and are converted into an electrical signal, which goes down the auditory nerve to the brain stem and is reconstructed into what’s referred to as music. Music is considered a popular entertainment and potent stimulation for brain waves. Music characteristics alter depending on the style and genre of music, resulting in varied impacts on brain activity. [2] According to UCF (University of Central Florida), music severely impacts brain function and human behaviour, including reducing stress, pain, and symptoms of depression, as well as improving cognitive and motor skills. Music affects many parts of the brain. Some of them are the temporal lobe, frontal lobe, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum. [3] This research paper will go into deep about the effect of music on specific parts of the brain, music’s impact on daily routines and moods, and how music can participate in curing some diseases.

II. How Brains Process Sound

Music is a solid and frequent emotional experience for many individuals, yet so few of us comprehend entirely how certain sounds impact emotions. To grasp how bodies interact with sound. [2] Simply put, the body senses sound as vibrations and convert them into electric pulses. The cochlear nerve system transports electrical impulses into the brain via nerve cells called neurons. The signals are sent to the brain’s cerebral cortex via the cochlear nerve system. While this may not appear to be incredibly "simple", it is one of the most complex things bodies perform daily - scientists have uncovered the critical phases of how sound flows from the source to the brain. [4]

The main parts that are affected by music are

  • Temporal lobe
  • Amygdala
  • Frontal lobe
  • Cerebellum
  • Hippocampus

They will be explained in detail in the coming sections.

i. Temporal lobe

Figure 1
Figure 1 Temporal lobe [3]
The temporal lobe is in the bottom part of the brain, immediately behind the temples within the skull, from where it derives its name. It is also located above the brain stem and the cerebellum. The temporal lobe plays a critical role in establishing and maintaining both conscious and long-term memory. [5] The temporal lobe interprets various frequencies, noises, and pitches received through the ears. As part of this process, the temporal lobe in humans is responsible for selective hearing. Selective hearing aids in filtering superfluous frequencies, allowing a person to focus on the vital noises in their surroundings. As the brain's language centre, the temporal lobe enables song lyrics comprehension. The temporal lobe is always engaged when listening to music, especially songs without lyrics. The temporal lobe is the music processing centre, but two of its subregions allow for more enjoyment of what is heard. [6]

ii. Amygdala

Figure 2
Figure 2 Amygdala [3]
The amygdala is a complex collection of cells located in the brain’s centre, near the hippocampus (associated with memory formation). The amygdala is primarily. While the amygdala might warn of an oncoming ambulance or an aggressive dog, it is also the portion of the brain that makes people happy when hearing a familiar voice or the soothing sounds of rain. [7] The amygdala has a clear relationship to music, and studies suggest that reactions to specific music genres are practically universal. Music may generate the same emotional cues as the noises stated above: a horror film soundtrack can elicit nearly primordial terror, while a soaring war march can inspire enthusiasm. Similarly, meditation music can help relax the mind and the body. And, regardless of the listener's prior mood, catchy pop music might induce an easy smile. The amygdala is responsible for all these physiological reactions to music. [8]

iii. Frontal lobe

Figure 3
Figure 3 Frontal lobe [3]
The name implies that the frontal lobe is in the front of the brain. The frontal lobe's right hemisphere governs the left side of the body and vice versa. While neurologists do not entirely understand how music influences the frontal lobe, musical interests, perspectives, and preferences for genres and songs are influenced by frontal brain activity. According to research, the frontal brain serves as a centre for how to respond to music. Those are still being researched, although this portion of the brain is a common target for music therapists. [6]

iv. Cerebellum

Figure 4
Figure 4 cerebellum [3]
The cerebellum is a part of the brain located at the back of the brain between the occipital and temporal lobes of the cerebral cortex. Despite accounting for only around 10% of the brain's volume, the cerebellum contains more than 50% of the brain's total number of neurons. [9] The cerebellum does not originate motor signals; it changes motor commands from the descending pathways to make motions more adaptable and accurate. Movement is a typical musical result and is closely related to the cerebellum. The cerebellum is the brain region that prompts and coordinates movement in reaction to (or in rhythm with) music, whether tapping a foot, dancing a jig, or plucking an air guitar. Playing instruments is likewise entirely dependent on this portion of the brain. According to research, even a few weeks of piano training can affect the cerebellum. Those functional alterations aren't limited to performing music; simply listening to music or envisioning playing the piano can have the same effect. The cerebellum is also in charge of muscle memory. While cognitive ability and long-term memory might deteriorate with age, the cerebellum matures differently as a discrete portion of the brain. This has resulted in reports of coma patients reacting to the music, Alzheimer's patients playing instruments, and stroke sufferers rediscovering their voices via singing. As a result, the cerebellum is very useful for various types of music therapy. [10]

v. Hippocampus

Graph 1
Graph 1 Depression with and without music therapy [28]
The hippocampus is a complicated brain region located deep within the temporal lobe. It serves a crucial role in learning and memory. It is a malleable and fragile structure that many stressors may harm. According to research, it is also impacted by several neurological and mental illnesses. [11] Music does not simply have a momentary influence on the brain; research reveals that hearing or playing music changes brain shape and brain function, especially when the same music is played again. This is because the hippocampus is opposed to the cerebellum.
Figure 5
Figure 5 hippocampus [3]
Scientific research on the hippocampus has revealed a substantial relationship between music listening and long-term and short-term memory. With its themes and phrases, music's repetitive nature stimulates short-term memory while creating long-term memories. That's why individuals may remember a song they heard on the radio the day before but also recall the dress they wore and who else was in the car when they heard that music 30 years later. This impact varies depending on the sort of music being played. This lends credence to the notion that music may strongly influence brain activity. Music may be produced to target different brain areas, eliciting various emotions from the listener. While this enables musicians and composers to create profoundly emotional music works, it also demonstrates that music may be a beneficial tool for healthcare practitioners. [12]

III. Music: A closer look

Music affects the feelings and mood of listeners and musicians in many ways that have been proven by research. It can be noticed when feeling special after listening to the favourite music now, or when music excites, or when deeply moved when hearing a romantic song, but in all cases, when listening to liked music, have fun regardless of its nature, which happens scientifically.

i. Effect of Music on Dopamine

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter that transmits information between nerve cells. It is also an essential and dangerous hormone that helps improve mood and a feeling of inner happiness and very comfortable satisfaction within a system known as the reward system within the brain. Neurons in the brain release dopamine within several dopaminergic pathways when doing a favourite thing or beloved to us, regardless of whether it is helpful or harmful. [13] Some research indicates that listening to music can create peak emotions, which increase the amount of dopamine. Thus, if this statement is confirmed, it indicates that music has two positive and harmful effects in the long run. As for the positive impact, it is represented in the feeling of pleasure, happiness, and satisfaction associated with listening to music and thus relaxation of nerves and calm. The bad thing is that research confirms that the secretion of dopamine over time is a result of Doing a sure thing that will lead to addiction, and thus addiction to music, which may hurt the person, and from here conclude that listening to purposeful music must be sponsored to avoid that. [14]

ii. Music and attention

Most people have tried listening to music while performing specific tasks, such as studying while listening to music, believing that this helps them focus, motivates them to continue, and improves their mood, increasing their productive and absorptive capacity.

The result was uneven for people; for some, it was positive for him and increased their production capacity and helped them well, while for others, the music distracted their attention and reduced their productivity in the same period compared to others.

The answer to this problem is that music does not affect people similarly. It differs from one person to another. It may be helpful for people to produce and harmful to others.

When music is helpful for a person while performing his tasks, it will reduce pressure and impressively stimulate him, improve his mood, and help him to focus, memorise and understand well. Still, to be helpful, certain types of music must be listened to because some music may be harmful to them, and the kind of music varies according to the person the listener.

As for the other type of people harmed by listening to music while working, this happens because it reduces their focus, distracts their attention, and makes memorising and understanding complex. Therefore, the matter varies from person to person, and the process is not equal for everyone. The person must try it himself, in the beginning, to determine his condition in this matter. [15]

iii. Music and Memory

Some research says it has been found that in musicians, compared to non-musicians, there is more grey matter in the part of the frontal cortex known to accommodate neural networks involved in many crucial working memory processes.

After knowing this information, can music help develop memory and help treat Alzheimer's disease?

Research strongly indicates that music significantly improves memory, as music works to reactivate some brain cells responsible for memory.

Music has played a significant role in helping Alzheimer’s disease treatment, as listening to music brings back old memories related to the patient, which allows us to treat him better.

Alive Inside movie tells how music can help restore parts of memory and improve brain health and quality of life for Alzheimer's patients. [16]

IV. Music therapy

Music therapy is the clinical application of music to achieve customised goals such as stress reduction, mood enhancement, and self-expression. It is a well-established evidence-based treatment in the medical world. Listening, singing, playing instruments, or making music are all examples of music therapy experiences.

Behavioural, biological, developmental, pedagogical, humanistic, adaptive music instruction and other paradigms may be used in music therapy.

Music therapy improves one's quality of life by incorporating interactions between a skilled music therapist and one individual and another, the individual and their family, and the music and the participants. These connections are organised and changed using musical components to create a good atmosphere and set the stage for successful growth. [17]

Music therapy can treat things like

  • ASD
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Chronic pain
  • Substance abusing

Those things will be discussed in detail in the coming sections.

i. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Autism spectrum disorder is a brain development illness that affects how a person sees and socialises with others, producing difficulties with social interaction and communication. The condition also exhibits restricted and repetitive behavioural patterns. The word "spectrum" refers to the various symptoms and severity associated with an autism spectrum disorder.
Graph 2
Graph 2 Negative behavior with and without music therapy [29]
Autism spectrum disorder encompasses formerly distinct disorders such as autism, Asperger's syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder, and an unidentified kind of pervasive developmental disability. Some individuals still refer to autism spectrum disorder as "Asperger's syndrome," which is widely regarded at the moderate end of the spectrum. [18]

Autism spectrum condition manifests itself in early infancy and ultimately creates social, academic, and occupational functioning difficulties. Autism symptoms often appear in youngsters during the first year of life. A tiny proportion of children seem to grow normally in the first year but subsequently have regression between 18 and 24 months when they acquire autistic symptoms.

While there is no cure for autism spectrum conditions, early intervention may significantly impact the lives of many children.

Music therapy may assist children with ASD in improving their abilities in main outcome areas such as social interaction, verbal communication, initiating behaviour, and socioemotional reciprocity. Within the treatment framework, music therapy may also assist in improving nonverbal communication abilities. Furthermore, music therapy may enhance social adaption abilities in children with ASD and promote the quality of parent-child interactions in secondary outcome domains.

Children with ASD have the same obstacles in music therapy as in other therapeutic modalities, in school settings, or at home. To date, research has provided some evidence of effectiveness. In secondary and tertiary diagnostic services, child development centres, and clinical and educational settings where music therapy is included as part of the multidisciplinary services, this intervention is most notable in promoting interpersonal communication, reciprocity, and the development of relationship-building skills. [19]

ii. Alzheimer's disease

Graph 3
Graph 3 AD patients with and without music therapy [30]
Alzheimer's disease is a brain illness that progressively deteriorates memory and cognitive functions, as well as the ability to do fundamental tasks. Most people with the disease — those with late-onset symptoms — have symptoms in their mid-60s. Early-onset Alzheimer's disease is uncommon and occurs between 30 and 60. Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia among the elderly. [20]

Because there is no treatment for the condition, others focus on measures to enhance a patient's quality of life. Music has several advantages for people living with Alzheimer’s at various stages of the illness. Music therapy has been shown in studies to enhance a patient's attention and capacity to interact with people close to them and may reduce their need for psychiatric medicines.

Music has various advantages for people with Alzheimer’s at each stage of the illness. This is particularly true in the latter stages of Alzheimer's disease, when individuals may become disconnected from their surroundings and lose their capacity to interact and connect with people verbally.

When people with Alzheimer’s hear music, they often experience a perceptible shift. They may perk up and become more interested in their environment. They may sing, dance, or clap their hands when they hear music. Responses to rhythm bypass the brain's standard response mechanism. Instead, the brain reacts directly to the music and instructs the body to respond by clapping, swaying, or humming. [21]

Going out dancing or attending a concert may aid patients in the early stages of the condition. Respect their preferences, even music they used to like. Brain alterations may influence their musical perception. Those who used to play an instrument may find it pleasurable to do so again. Note and play precious pieces, such as wedding tunes, to evoke good recollections.

As the condition worsens, listening to music while walking may improve balance. Music may also be utilised to lift a person with Alzheimer's mood, and relaxing music can assist with nocturnal behaviour concerns. Later, while recalling old occurrences, the same favoured bits may spark a person's recollection. Music often stimulates people living with advanced Alzheimer’s to exercise. Relaxing music also relaxes and comforts. [22]

iii. Chronic pain

Endorphins are released when listening to music, according to this article. Endorphins are chemicals that interact with pain receptors in bodies, disrupting pain signals and providing a sense of well-being. They operate similarly to opioids but without undesirable side effects. Endorphins function as the body's natural painkillers.

For years, music has been used to treat acute pain (such as during cancer treatment and before, during, and after surgery) with substantial success. Many studies show that when music therapy is used after surgery, patients take fewer painkillers and have a more positive attitude. [23]

This use of music in acute pain treatment may also be used for chronic pain. In the long run, the same analgesic effect may be obtained, reducing the need for medicines. When combined with other established pain treatment techniques and therapies, patients may have a significant reduction in pain and a notable increase in their levels of functioning.

Studies show that music stimulates parts of the brain that control and decrease pain. This indicates that listening to music may assist the brain in managing and minimise discomfort in the body. Those suffering from chronic pain often feel detached or dissociated from our bodies as a coping mechanism. This may lead to a loss of self-awareness. Patients may benefit from music therapy by being more aware of their bodies and reconnecting with themselves. This understanding may assist patients in learning how to control their symptoms better. [24]

Distraction tactics (such as listening to music) may be helpful in everyday life. Distraction is one of the primary coping mechanisms to deal with chronic pain and bipolar condition. Distracting allows attention to more positive things rather than lingering anxieties or pessimism. Music can greatly assist, whether it's distracting from discomfort during exercise or singing a song to improve mood and re-energize when taking a break from work.

Research on the use of music as a treatment for chronic pain sufferers discovered that those who listened to music had a higher quality of life despite their discomfort. "Music may offer an emotionally engaging diversion capable of lowering both the sense of pain and the associated unpleasant affective experience," they discovered.

Many patients retreat from social events for fear of aggravating their pain or inability to keep up with loved ones. This may lead to loneliness, exacerbating chronic pain symptoms, stress, and destructive emotions. Music therapy may provide a feeling of connection and involvement, mainly when done in a group setting where patients can meet others who are going through similar challenges. [25]

V. Substance abusing

Graph 4
One advantage of music therapy is that it can be utilised in almost any situation. It may be used in intense inpatient treatment programs, outpatient programs, group settings, and any other structured intervention. Music therapy may be used to treat drug use disorders to reduce stress, help people relax, boost focus on recovery, and assist those struggling to adapt to the demands of substance use disorder recovery. When utilised under the supervision of a music therapist, music therapy has defined aims, and its application is employed to achieve these goals. [26]

vdo not need to participate in a structured music therapy intervention program to benefit from the use of music. Music may be used discreetly to improve mood, forget about the stresses of the day, and as a distraction tool to cope with cravings and other challenges typical in recovery. Whether used as a standard form of therapy or as a private method of relaxation and treatment improvement, music is not intended to be a replacement for a professional drug use disorder treatment program. It is intended to boost the effectiveness of these initiatives. [27]

VI. Conclusion

Many things related to the effect of music on the brain have been clarified in two ways, the first psychological and the other from an anatomical point of view of the brain. From a psychological point of view, it was concluded that music affects mood, attention, and memory. The seven strategies that improve the listener's perspective were concluded behind the impact of music on dopamine. The impact of music on memory was influential, as it is used to enhance the process of treating Alzheimer's disease. On the other hand, the research paper showed how music affects the brain in terms of the physiology of some parts of the brain affected by music. At the beginning of this part, the mechanism of the hearing process and its understanding through the brain have been explained well. The five elements of the brain that are affected by music have been clarified: the temporal lobe, amygdala, frontal lobe cerebellum, and hippocampus. The location of each part of the brain, its role in the listening process, and the effect of music on it were shown clearly. In the third and final section of the research paper, the significant role of music in treating many diseases and solving many health problems was presented. It has been shown that music therapy effectively solves many health problems, and four examples of health problems that music can contribute to their treatment have been clarified. These four diseases are autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, and substance abuse. From all these words, we can deduce the role of music and sounds in our lives. In the end, every process that happens is calculated and accurate, and not a coincidence, and with careful consideration and patience, everything can be exploited for the benefit of man.

VII. References

Major Depressive Disorder: the changes in the global connectivity of the frontoparietal cognitive control network

Abstract Variation in mental health among people may usually indicate the persistence of mental illnesses even if the individual lacks the diagnostic criteria for this illness. In order to clarify the factors that reveal the presence of mental illness risks, and the subclinical problems affecting life quality, it is essential to study and analyze the individual variability regarding their mental health. In fact, studying the relationship between mental health symptoms and resting-state functional connectivity patterns in cognitive control systems is the key which will reveal a better understanding of the variability of the brain’s large-scaled mechanism. The frontoparietal cognitive control network (FPN) is a control network serving to rapidly and instantiate new task states by flexibly interacting with other control and processing networks. Any change in FPN would disrupt the ability of symptoms regulation resulting in negatively mental health impacts. In fact, depression symptoms severity negatively correlated with between-network global connectivity (BGC) of the FPN. From this, it is supposed that any decrease in the connectivity between the FPN and the rest parts of the brain is related to increasing the severity of depression symptoms for the person in general.

I. Introduction

Depression, altering more than 264 million people around the world1, is a severe mental health disorder that frequently leads to suicide. In order to be diagnosed with depression, a patient should meet at least four symptoms based on criteria. Also, the symptoms should have persisted for two weeks. The criteria are irritability, anorexia, feeling empty or sad, insomnia, and weight change. Although some people might not meet the criteria, they would experience some symptoms of depression. In this review, this natural variability was used, helping in comprehending the neuroscience of poor mental health and factors that might contribute to developing a severe mental illness. One study hypothesized that symptoms of poor mental health are related to the Front-parietal network (FPN). According to another study, the FPN has a physiological role in protecting against mental health symptoms.

Disturbance in the FPN function, altering the domain-general neurocognitive feedback system capable of regulating symptoms as they occur, is the primary reason for multiple mental disorders. The FPN is a flexible hub, which means it can quickly modify the functional connections regarding its goals because it has high connectivity across the brain. Individual variations in the overall capacity to control cognition can influence symptoms, according to significant evidence that the FPN functions are domain-general. Depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and eating disorders have been noticed in patients with disturbances in FPN functional connectivity (FC). In this review, we focused on FC assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), estimated as the material connection in the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal between brain areas. At the same time, individuals relax in the scanner.

Two studies estimated a summary statistic regarding the level of conductivity of FPN around the brain. However, the relative size of different networks can impact these calculations. For instance, nodes with a smaller network will have fewer connections than the more extensive network. Thus, a study used between-network global connectivity (BGC) to determine how effectively a brain area is connected to its rest.

Patients suffering from severe depression had anomalies in FC patterns in the brain, which involved FPN functional connections. In addition, patients suffering from depression had lower conductivity between FPN areas. A similar result was seen in undiagnosed people with depressive symptoms. Furthermore, according to another research, global brain connectivity was reduced in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and medial prefrontal cortex sections of FPN in individuals with depression. Moreover, A disruption in FC within the DLPFC has been indicated in patients suffering from depression. Also, the same result was found in the default mode network (DMN). Researchers have also sought to categorize depression based on FC patterns. The reduced connectivity in FPN is the most common subtype involving fatigue and anxiety. In addition, when patients are trying to regulate their emotions or being threatened activation in the FPN and changes in FPN FC have been indicated. There is a decline in global brain connectivity in depressed individuals; the FC value for each region's connections has been revealed inside the prefrontal cortex. The loss in global brain connection was saved by using ketamine therapy.

Research on the global connectivity of the front-parietal cognitive control network will be reviewed in this review. It was expected that individual variations in depression symptoms in undiagnosed persons would relate to BGC in the FPN, based on a previously proposed theoretical framework and detected FPN FC changes in patients with severe depression. Support for our theory would give vital evidence for the possibly widespread involvement of global FPN intrinsic FC in controlling mental health symptoms.

II. Major Depressive Disorder

Figure 1
Figure 1: The circuits in the brain that contain neurotransmitters and may be dysfunctional in areas where depressive symptoms are present.
The hippocampus controls the recall and control of emotional memories with the assistance of the amygdala. Hippocampus is a complex brain structure embedded deep into the temporal lobe. Notably, people with depression frequently have reduced hippocampus volume, which correlates with depressive episodes' length and frequency. Major depressive disorder affects several areas of the brain (figure 1). The Monoaminergic neurotransmission influences these brain areas' structure and function by providing the neural basis for mood, motivation, and reward. Consequently, disruptions in the functional connectivity in these neural networks play a vital role in developing severe depression. Three critical hormones are commonly modulated by monoaminergic neurotransmission: serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine.

i. Serotonin

Serotonin) 5-hydroxytryptamine) is a monoamine neurotransmitter that plays a crucial role in modulating mood and cognition. Studies have shown that MDD patients have serotonin depletion. The serotonin levels can be affected by many reasons or complications in the body as follows:

Tryptophan depletion

Serotonin is derived from an amino acid called tryptophan. The patient medication can affect the tryptophan levels, causing tryptophan depletion that decreases serotonin levels. Also, tryptophan depletion can be caused by suffering from MDD for a few months. Hopefully, the tryptophan depletion patients tend not to show any mood changes following tryptophan depletion.

Polymorphisms

Figure 2
Figure 2: The direct correlation between the increase in stress and the risk of getting Major Depressive Disorder.
Polymorphisms are a group of genes that perform vital processes in the human brain. The number of particular types of neurons and their synaptic connections, the intracellular transduction of neuronal signals, the metabolism of neurotransmitters and their receptors, and the changes in response to environmental stressors are mainly controlled by the polymorphisms. The serotonin transporter gene is the most studied in major depressive disorder. It has a polymorphism that results in two distinct alleles (long and short). The short allele slows down the serotonin transporter's production. Consequently, the rate at which serotonin neurons adjust to changes in their stimulation is considered slowing down. The polymorphism may affect a person's sensitivity to stress since an acute stressor boosts serotonin release. Stress affects the serotonin transporter that carries the short allele, making it very vulnerable

ii. Dopamine

Dopamine is a modulatory neurotransmitter responsible for the motivational component of reward-motivated behavior. In our case study, dopamine plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. Prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum dopamine levels rise in response to amygdala-perceived environmental threats. Local inhibitory feedback makes sure that equilibrium is restored. A significant stressor can interfere with this feedback mechanism by changing the amounts of brain-derived neurotrophic factors in the striatum. For example, an improper salience or slightly unpleasant stimuli may result from abnormal feedback in the striatal dopamine system. The impact of stressful life events in the past on current mood is influenced by a variation in the dopamine type 2 receptor gene. In MDD patients, a severe increase of striatal D2 receptor binding in the amygdala's postmortem central and basal nuclei. Through interactions with the environment, the dopamine system's genetic make-up may impact sensitivity to major depressive disorder, which results in Anhedonia: the inability to feel pleasure.

iii. Norepinephrine

Norepinephrine, a chemical that is produced mainly by sympathetic nerve fiber endings, is responsible for the "fight or flight" system in the body. NE plays a determinant role in executive functioning, regulating cognition, motivation, and intellect, which are fundamental in social relationships. The cell bodies in the locus coeruleus in the brain manage adrenergic pathways, connecting to various parts of the brain and the spinal cord. NE neurons end significant projections to the limbic system in addition to the frontal cortex.
Figure 3
Figure 3: The binding of norepinephrine neurotransmitters for their receptors from the presynaptic to the postsynaptic membrane.
The density and sensitivity of 2α-adrenoceptors, which modulate NE release, are altered by increased β-adrenergic receptor binding in the frontal cortex in MDD patients. Additionally, locus coeruleus postmortem tissues from people with significant depression have been shown to have reduced NE transporter binding. All of these alterations are caused by the physiopathology of depression. Regardless of the explanation, these findings suggest that NE plays a significant role in depression. Dare decreased alertness, low energy, issues with inattention, focus, and cognitive function are linked to lower NE neurotransmission.

FPN is a system responsible for the general goal-attaining process, involving regulating the mental disorder symptoms. Thus, the differences in FPN BGC are somehow related to depression symptoms. A study demonstrated a notable correlation between the rate of connection of the FPN to the rest of the brain and the availability of depressive symptoms in persons who have not previously been diagnosed with depression. Using BGC, the results estimated that patients with fewer depression symptoms have an FPN hat is more connected to the brain regions.

III. Between-Network Global Connectivity measures how strongly each brain region is linked to the rest of the brain networks

BGC is a method that evaluates the mean FC between each brain region and the other network brain regions. BGC mitigates the potential bias of other graph centrality metrics, which can be exaggerated in locations with vast networks. A study demonstrated that the BGC in the DMN is relatively low. Another study, using the participation coefficient, showed the same findings as the previous findings. Although the findings of the two studies indicated some similarities, there were some dissimilarities. Some of these disparities might be attributed to BGC and participation coefficient variances. Generally, the participation coefficient is computed by thresholding a graph and then evaluating the distribution of edges between networks. A high value implies that the edges are dispersed evenly to other networks. In contrast, a low value shows that the edges preferentially connect nodes in a smaller number of other networks. BGC does not require a graph to be threshold before computation and compares the mean FC weight for each region to all other out-of-network regions. However, previous techniques employing global brain connectivity and degree, which both include within-network connections, result in DMN areas with effective connectivity to the rest of the brain; These findings show that prior studies identifying the DMN as strongly linked to the rest of the brain are mostly driven by high FC within the DMN rather than increased connectivity between the DMN and nodes in other functional networks. The brain regions in which the BGC was high are the motor and tactile cortex, the lateral prefrontal cortex, the auditory cortex, and higher order visual regions. BGC was high in the lateral prefrontal regions, and higher order visual areas have more FC and global brain connectivity. The lateral prefrontal cortex, higher-order visual areas, auditory cortex, and somatosensory cortex have all been found to have increased global brain connection. After going through the previous methods and BGC, there were some differences between them. In lower visual areas, BGC was relatively low, in contrast to greater connectivity estimates computed by others. The disparities reported between BGC, and other measures of connectivity strength may be due to BGC failing to account for the relatively strong local connections within the visual network. Indeed, the primary and secondary visual cortex have a higher local connection strength than remote connectivity.

IV. BGC in the FPN Is Negatively Correlated with Depression Symptoms

BGC is consistent with the previous attempts at the degree of connectivity classification in brain regions. In fact, BGC’s concentration is quite lower in the lower visual regions. In fact, the primary and the secondary visual cortex show high local connectivity rather than distant ones. The presence of BGC in FPN correlates negatively to depression symptoms, as it was found that individuals who experience greater connectivity of the FPN with the rest parts of the brain experience fewer depression symptoms. This emphasizes that the well-connected FPN can serve as a protective shield against depression and mental health symptoms. In fact, FPN FC decreases were reported in individuals diagnosed with major depression. It helped in dividing depression into subtypes as well. Decreases in FC in the language network have been reported in depression patients and language performance deficits have also been reported in depression patients. The current results might be consistent with these observed deficits in language in depressed individuals. However, future studies should attempt to replicate these results in an independent large sample.

Severe depression symptoms can cause an obvious reduced FC between dIPFC and the supramarginal gyrus, instead of decreased levels of connectivity between the superior parietal lobule and the dIPFC. Currently, the found therapies work on treating via modulating the prefrontal cortex FC in depression patients which are expected to develop more in the future and include targeting the treatment of network communication aspects.

V. Methods of Study

i. Demographic Data Analysis

Table 1
Participants' demographic data were gathered, and they answered 11 questions about their hand use for various tasks, such as writing, throwing, using scissors, holding their toothbrush, striking a match, opening a box, kicking, using a knife, using a spoon, placing one hand on top of another while using a broom, and using which eye when using just one. Each question was answered with one of the following options: always right, often right, no preference often left, or always left. Answers were given a score based on whether they were always right (2), often right (1), no preference (0), often left (-1), or always left (-2). These scores were added up to create the laterality quotient (LQ), which was then divided by the highest possible score of 22. An LQ score of -100 shows a strong preference for the left hand, 0 for no preference, and 100 for a strong preference for the right hand. Right-handedness was self-reported by each participant. One person, however, showed an LQan showing a preference for the left hand. All analyses have taken the person who prefers using their left hand into account. According to studies, the CESD can be divided into one or four variables. Tree factor scores—somatic symptoms, negative affect, and anhedonia—were computed in addition to each participant's raw CESD score, based on a recent study. During the behavior-only session, participants also finished a number of flexible cognition tests. These tests included the culture fair test by Cattell, the goal neglect task by Duncan, and Raven's progressive matrices. 96 people made up the final sample (Table 1)

ii. fMRI Processing and Network Assignment and Analysis

fMRI processing

The Human Connectome Project minimal preprocessing pipeline, version 3.5.0, was used to preprocess functional MRI data. Anatomical restructuring and segmentation, EPI reconstruction, segmentation, and spatial normalization to a reference template were all included in the preprocessing steps. Additionally, intensity normalization and motion correction were performed.

Network Assignment and Analysis

Figure 4
Figure 4: By Spronk et al. constructed network assignments (2017). A community detection technique was used to assign each parcel to a network using resting-state fMRI data from a separate dataset (HCP: 100 unrelated). This produced a total of 12 networks. Each parcel's network assignment is indicated by color.
Briefly, the Generalized Louvain was used to assign each parcel to a network. Using data from the resting state, this process was carried out. Twelve useful networks were discovered. (Figure 2). The major characteristics of various previously published network partitions are replicated by the functional network topology findings. There is a substantial correlation between the degree of BGC and the frequency with which subjects had depressive symptoms. The study was specifically looking for a measure that could quantify the strength of FC for every region compared to every other region in every other network. BGC was determined for each region separately and was established as the mean FC for all connections made outside of the network. All connections from a source region to targets outside the source region's network were referred to as out-of-network connections. Each region of the brain underwent this process in order to obtain a BGC value. To summarize impacts at the network level, the mean BGC value was then determined for each of the functional networks. The relationship between BGC and depression symptoms in all brain networks was tested. The main hypothesis is that BGC in the FPN was correlated with depression symptoms.

VI. VSRAD and MRI

Figure 5
Figure 5: A) Z score map of a patient with MDD (58 year old Female) B) A healthy control group individual (60 year old female). Color scale of Z score is present in the upper left part.
Volume reduced brain areas in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were studied through whole-brain analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipped with a Voxel-based Specific Regional analysis system for Alzheimer’s disease (VSRAD). 71 patients with MDD, enrolled in the study, were aged between 54 and 82 years. 44% of the patients experienced complications from panic or anxiety disorders. A healthy control group consisting of 33 individuals, that had no history of having MDD, was also tested for comparison with the MDD patients. VSRAD was used to evaluate the local brain volume of patients through a comparison with visual information gathered from MRI scans of healthy individuals by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM), an imaging technique that investigates focal differences in brain anatomy. A T1-weighted scan, an MRI modality, of the brain was processed with SPM (Statistical Parametric Mapping) to isolate grey matter. Then, automated statistical analysis of grey matter density for the entire brain was done. The magnitude of grey matter density disparity, standard deviation x n, in individual patients from the healthy individual's means (Z-score) was calculated for each region of the brain. Data from T1 weighted sagittal images were analyzed and the obtained Z score map was checked for the absence/presence of colored areas, which indicates volume reduction. Areas showing volume reduction by Z score ≥2 were colored blue on the obtained brain images.
Table 2
Table 2: Volume reduction in different regions of the brain
Of the 71 patients with MDD, volume reduction in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and amygdala was seen in 20, 35, 66, and 21 patients, respectively. ACC volume reduction appeared more than volume reduction in any other region and had a sensitivity of 93% as an indicator for diagnosing MDD. This provides a means for diagnosing depression using neuroimaging techniques and shows that depression does not affect mental health only, but also has biological effects on the human brain.

VII. Conclusion

Due to their close connections to other brain networks and capacity to act as a feedback mechanism capable of managing symptoms in a goal-directed way, cognitive control networks play a significant role in mental health. These findings imply that the global network architecture of the human brain is crucial for preserving mental health, even in those who are undiagnosed, and they lend credence to the idea that the FPN keeps a goal-directed feedback loop in place to control symptoms as they manifest. Future research will be crucial in defining the precise pathways by which FPN affects symptoms and evaluating the feasibility of improving FPN FC with the goal of reducing symptoms and possibly delaying the onset of mental disease.

VII. References

Conscious Brain Mind-Controlled Cybonthitic Cyborg Bionic-Leg - V2

Overview Lower limb amputations affect about 28.9 million people worldwide, influencing normal human functions, we are developing a conscious brain mind-controlled Cybonthitic cyborg bionic-leg to provide a professional solution for this problem, which is classified as restricted knee movement, short-term solution, limited pressure bearing, unspecific analog reading of EMG; Because the output voltage measured in nano-volts, resulting in unspecific knee movement. The functionality of these modern gadgets is still limited due to a lack of neuromuscular control (i.e. For movement creation, control relies on human efferent neural signals to peripheral muscles). Electromyographic (EMG) or myoelectric signals are neuromuscular control signals that can be recorded from muscles for our engineering goals. We worked on a sophisticated prosthetic knee design with a 100-degree angle of motion. We also used a specific type of coiled spring to absorb abrupt or unexpected motion force. In addition, we amplified the EMG output from (Nano-Voltage) to (Milli-Voltage) using customized instrumentation amplifiers (operational amplifiers). We used a full-wave rectifier to convert AC to DC, as a consequence of these procedures, sine-wave output voltage measures in millivolts, and the spring constant indicates the most force for every 1cm. Von mises Stress analysis shows bearing as 3000N is the maximum load for the design. Detecting the edge of a stairwell using the first derivative. The benefit of a system that controls the prosthetic limb is activated by the patient’s own EMG impulses, rather than sensors linked to the body.

I. Introduction

A prosthesis is a term that refers to an artificial device that replaces a physical component or organ. A prosthetic leg replaces a lower limb that has been amputated for many reasons. The National Limb Loss Information Center supplied the amputation data in that there are roughly 1.7 million people living with limb loss in the United States [5]. A Myoelectric A prosthetic leg, as the name indicates, is a prosthetic leg which employs myoelectric (EMG) impulses for control. This is feasible owing to the fact that the neuro-muscular system of amputees remains intact even after amputation. The remaining signals are made use of, and they are adequate enough to control the movement of the leg after proper processing [6]. Actuators such as motors are employed to replace the function that muscles perform by delivering force for movement of the leg. Myoelectric prosthetic legs stand apart from externally powered legs, which rely on external power for controlling the limb from pulses that are sent from your brain.

II. METHODS

A. sEMG Signal Processing

Figure 1
Fig. 1. Neural network for signal processing. Adapted from Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
Electromyography signals are used to determine the electri- cal activity of muscle fibres during contraction and rest. Two approaches are used to capture these myoelectric signals: inva- sive and noninvasive. Invasive methods use needle electrodes to record the sEMG signal. However, noninvasive is often preferable, since it is positioned right above the skin surface without requiring the electrode to be inserted into the patient’s body. Numerous issues such as motion artefacts, electrode misplacement, and noise interpolation all have an effect on the EMG signal. To extract additional information, signal pro- cessing techniques including as filtering, rectification, baseline drifting, and threshold levelling are used to EMG signals. The block diagram of the EMG signal processing is depicted in (figure 1).
As shown in (fig 1) The fast Fourier transform (FFT) steadily transforms a time-domain signal into different fre- quency scales. Hence, the FFT was selected to extract EMG features in this study. The statistical parameter of FFT energy coefficients can be obtained using the following equation:
Equation 1
(1)
Figure 2
Fig. 2. Instrumentation amplifier and its gain

Three pre-gelled surface electrodes are used to capture EMG data for limb rotational movement. Two electrodes are inserted into the limb’s acromial and clavicular portions of the central deltoid muscle (anterior fibers). For efficient grounding, the other portion is equipped with a ground electrode. Surface electrodes are used to detect EMG signals. However, the selected signal has an amplitude of microvolts. Thus, a preamplifier is required to convert the microvoltage EMG signal (µV) to millivoltage (mV). The EMG signal is delivered into the preamplifier directly from the electrode. Using Instrumentation Amplifier (IA) as shown in (fig 2) cause having a high CMRR, a high input impedance, fixed gain for amplification, and high-low pass filtering.

As An instrumentation amplifier (IA) is used to provide a large amount of gain for very low-level signals, often in the presence of high noise levels. The major properties of IAs are high gain, large common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR), and very high input impedance

Features : Instrumentation amplifiers are precision, integrated operational amplifiers that have differential input and single- ended or differential output. Some of their key features include very high common mode rejection ratio (CMRR), high open loop gain, low DC offset, low drift, low input impedance, and low noise.

B. High and Low pass filtration

Figure 3
In order to eliminate the high frequency signal, the output of the preamplifier is fed into low pass filter. To design an effective filter, comparison is done with various filter topologies. as shown in (fig 3) that HPF and LPF are critical in filtering pulses that have been amplified. The EMG signals that have been saved are processed. To eliminate motion artefacts and external noise from the collected EMG data, a high pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 20 Hz is used. For stop band attenuation, a fourth order Butterworth high pass filter has been used. When examining muscular contraction, it is recommended to select dominant EMG signals with a frequency range of 20 Hz - 500 Hz. The EMG signals are corrupted by noise.

C. Rectification and Amplification

A corrected signal is required. The goal of rectification is to eliminate the signal’s negative components. By eliminating the negative components, the negative amplitude is converted to a positive value by squaring the total signal. As predicted, this step also squares the amplitude value. Additionally, if the amplitude is less than one, squaring would shift the amplitude away from one toward zero, lowering the value. Amplification is used to increase the signal’s amplitude to a suitable level. The signal is multiplied by a constant value, which increases the amplitude of the whole signal by that amount. The output of this step is a positive signal (devoid of negative components) with an amplitude within the specified range.

D. Smoothening

After the first few processing stages, the signal in hand still resembles an EMG signal in terms of contraction and relaxation phases, with the most noticeable difference being the conversion of negative components to positive ones after rectification. As previously stated, the contraction phase of the signal is the most interesting; thus, it must be separated from the remainder of the signal. This is accomplished by sending the signal through a low-pass filter that detects just the signal’s envelope. Smoothing produces a signal with blunt peaks precisely during contraction stages.

E. Prosthetic Leg Model

Figure 4
Fig. 4. 3D design of prosthetic limb
Making a prosthetic limb with a high bearing capacity, flexibility, comfort, and shock absorption for long-term usage requires considerable effort. When fabricating a prosthetic limb, it should be lightweight for ease of control and have a good load bearing capability. The prosthetic limb is con- structed from lightweight but robust materials. The limb may or may not have functioning knee and ankle joints, depending on the site of the amputation. The socket is a very accurate cast of your residual limb that fits snugly over it. It assists in the prosthetic leg’s attachment to your body. Suspension systems are used to secure the prosthesis, whether by sleeve suction, vacuum suspension/suction, or distal locking by pin or lanyard. As shown in (fig 4), numbers of models that are created for achieving engineering goals such as high bearing capacity, light, and long-term use.
Figure 5
Fig. 5. Angel of rotation
Following the selection of your prosthetic leg’s components, you will need rehabilitation to strengthen your legs, arms, and cardiovascular system as you learn to walk with your new limb. You’ll work closely with rehabilitation experts, physical therapists, and occupational therapists to develop a rehabilitation plan that is customised to your unique mobility requirements. Maintaining a healthy leg is a critical component of this routine.

Real-life ration modeling for the prosthetic leg with 100 angel of movement as shown in (fig 5).

F. Machine Learning for Amputees

1) Detection Stairs:

Using canny detection algorithm to detect edge as shown in (fig 6), and it analyzed data:

Noise Reduction: Edge detection is sensitive to image noise, the first step is to eliminate the noise with a 5x5 or 3x3 Gaussian filter.
Equation 2
(2)
Finding the Image’s Intensity Gradient: The smoothed picture is then filtered in both the horizontal and vertical directions with a Sobel kernel to obtain the first derivative in both the horizontal (Gy) and vertical (Gx) directions. We can find the edge gradient and direction for each pixel using equation(2).
Figure 6
Fig. 6. A convolution of a 5x5 image with a 3x3 kernel.
2) Pattern recognition Algorithm:

To estimate the intended joint trajectory, myoelectric signals and a pattern recognition algorithm may be used to forecast the user’s locomotor mode. The intended locomotor activity may be anticipated by recog- nising patterns in the EMG data (i.e., since various locomotor activities can be assessed using distinct joint trajectories). Mechanical signals, in addition to EMG signals, may be analysed and utilised for pattern recognition. To discover patterns in myoelectric data, pattern recognition methods such as linear discriminant analysis and dynamic Bayesian networks have been applied. However, these algorithms may introduce significant delays, particularly when switching between loco- motor activities. Successful intent classifiers have been created employing the forces at the human-socket connection, foot- ground contacts, myoelectric signals, and contralateral limb kinematics. It has been shown that including EMG signals and time history data into the control system considerably reduces classification mistakes during human prosthesis locomotion. Researchers have shown that unilateral transtibial amputees can forecast locomotor activity using myoelectric signals from the undamaged biological knee joint. By collecting signals and identifying the greatest and minimum values for data visualisa- tion, we can foresee the appearance and movement of muscles using the candlestick technique for pattern recognition. As the largest value is considered resistance, while the least value is considered support. Max and Min values are gathered and used as reference points for prediction, as they are included into the formula for prediction:

Equation 3
(3)

As data converted from 2d into 1D. Then, The segmented 1D data of the original time series are defined in this equation(3).

Figure 7
Fig. 7. Outputs of pattern recognition algorithm
As shown in (fig 7), By analyzing data, we can create a candlestick algorithm that predicts and recognizes any pattern. This is for the most exact movements of the bionic limb, since it is an excellent technique to forecast your movement and electrical pulse patterns.

III. Diagnostic Dystonia Using sEMG

Figure 8
Fig. 8. sEMG of a patient with runner’s dystonia presenting as task-specific. Adapted from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Runner’s dystonia (RD) is a task-specific focal dystonia of the lower limbs that occurs when running to diagnostic of dystonia. In this retrospective case series, we present surface electromyography (EMG) and joint kinematic data from thirteen patients who underwent instrumented gait anal- ysis (IGA) at the Functional and Biomechanics Laboratory at the National Institutes of Health [1]. Four cases of RD are described in greater detail to demonstrate the potential utility of EMG with kinematic studies to identify dysto- nia muscle groups in RD. Lateral heel whip, a proposed novel presentation of lower-limb dystonia, is also described. Surface EMG is showing continuous activity in the left ham- strings (b) and early activity in the left tibialis anterior during running (a). Showing how left leg delayed in activation of motor neuron with respect to other leg as shown in (fig 8).
Figure 9
Fig. 9. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the Vastus Lateralis during wholebody vibration at 30 Hz illustrated in (A) the time domain and (B) the frequency f0 domain. In the frequency domain, excessive spikes are visible at the vibration frequency and its multiple harmonics.
(A) in the time domain and in (B) in the frequency domain. The signal was recorded from the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle during Whole body vibration (WBV) at 30 Hz. While the sEMG signal in the time domain does not highlight any specific characteristics to WBV. The sEMG signal in the fre- quency domain clearly shows excessive spikes at the vibration frequency and at a few multiple harmonics and that means how dystonia is diagnostic obviously. At the same time, and also for preliminary purposes, the electrophysiological signal was recorded from the patella during WBV. Such a signal obtained during WBV at 30 Hz is shown in Figure 9. In the time domain, the patella signal resembles a sinusoidal wave at 30 Hz. In frequency domain, excessive spikes are observed at the vibration frequency and to a lower extent at its multiple harmonics. No myoelectrical activity is shown for all the other frequencies.
Figure 10
Fig. 10. sEMG signal processing methods in dystonia diagnostic. Adapted from Universite De Nice Sophia Antipolis
A surface electromyography (sEMG) spectrum of the Vastus Lateralis during whole-body vibration at 30 Hz. sEMG signals were processed using the no-filter method (black solid line), linear interpolation (grey solid line), band-stop filter (grey dotted line) and band-pass filter (black dashed line). As shown in Figure 10, The crucial role of filter especially High Pass filtration (HPF) and Low Pass filtration (LPF).

IV. Muscle Re-Innervation Patterns

Figure 11
Fig. 11. Evaluation of Muscle Re-innervation Patterns, electrical pulses were conveyed in both amputees and normal humans. Adapted from The new England Journal of medicine.
Strong EMG signals were elicited by the re-innervated ham- string muscles, notably during contractions related to ankle motions. When the patient flexed his knees, he noticed a lot of co-activation of re-innervated muscles (Fig.11). Each attempted move resulted in different EMG signal pat- terns, implying that precise pattern recognition control was possible. With a virtual system configured to regulate ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion, as well as knee flexion and extension, the classification accuracy of the patient’s attempted movements was 96.0 percent, and 92.0 percent with a system built to control tibial rotations and femoral rotation. In non- TMR amputees, classification accuracies for these attempted movements were 91.0 ± 4.7% and 86.8 ± 3.0%, Correspond- ingly. This amounts to a 5.0 percent and 5.2 percentage point boost in complete precision, correspondingly. TMR enhances real-time pattern-recognition control by 44 percent and 39 percent, respectively; these data imply that TMR improves real-time pattern-recognition control. Virtual movements were likewise completed more faster by the TMR amputees than by the non-TMR amputees. EMG data from the residual limb and mechanical-sensor data produced a unique stride pattern for each ambulation mode. The inclusion of EMG information increased the accuracy of the control system. With the use of mechanical-sensor data only.

V. Results

Figure 12
Fig. 12. Low Pass Filtration for reject and filter noise in background.
For finding the factors that may affect results. It is tested in various conditions. Test on 3 channels of EMG that collect electrical pulses. This shows how movement and shaking of your body affect and make noise in data when it collects. As shown in this graph when there is no cable movement, there is no noise in data. But when slow or fast cable movements, this makes spike, and noise in data. So, by using p300 algorithm, and low-pass filtration, it removes noise and spike to return to original value of it as shown in (Fig. 12).
As shown in (Fig. 13), How electrical impulses from an EMGs sensor are gathered, and how to display the data. It became negative and positive sides as it accumulated without any invert in waves. We employ Ins Amp and Op Amp to invert and integrate these data to address the problem. Then, to convert it from ac to dc, we utilize full wave rectifiers, which will make it easier to store the data. Low pass and high pass filters are crucial in cancelling any noise when data collected.
Figure 13
Fig. 13. Mechanism of electrical pulses From sEMG to captured it

A. Piezoelectric and Voltage generator

Figure 14
Fig. 14. Piezoelectric Results that differed by increase load
Piezoelectric Effect is the ability of certain materials to gener- ate an electric charge in response to applied mechanical stress. When piezoelectric material is placed under mechanical stress, a shifting of the positive and negative charge centers in the material takes place, which then results in an external electrical field. When reversed, an outer electrical field either stretches or compresses the piezoelectric material. Using piezoelectric devices to recharge batteries. It is necessary to test numerous times to see if it is suitable to be main voltage generator. As demonstrated in the graph, as the load increases, so does the voltage. The output was sufficient for being main voltage generator.

B. Stress Analysis of Presthestic limbs

Figure 15
Fig. 15. Von-Mises Stress analysis diagram, simulate the maximum load which the leg can effort. As shown in figure, the Max load the leg can bear approximately 3000 newtons.
For Design Prosthetic limb needs to have a high bearing capacity, flexibility, comfort, shock absorption, long-term use. For design, a prosthetic limb needs to have a high bearing capacity, flexibility, comfort, shock absorption, and long-term use.

VI. Conclusion

In this study, EMG signal is successfully extracted from the subject and the acquired EMG signal has two parts: relaxation phase and contraction phase. The contraction phase is what we are interested in for proceeding with the work. In order to control the motor rotation using the EMG signal, the contraction phase is made use of, for which it has to be processed suitably to result in a pulse output whenever the muscle is contracted. The steps involved in processing are those which convert the EMG signal into pulsed output for each contraction. The final output is a pulsed signal where each pulse corresponds to muscle contraction. When considering prosthetics limb, more degree of freedom is required. So our future work extends to signal classification such as K-means algorithm and support vector machine.

VII. References